From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Qiao Zhou Subject: [DAPM question] DAPM support for single input multiple outputs Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 16:38:53 +0800 Message-ID: <54FD5C1D.9030909@marvell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com [67.231.156.173]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464DA2605EA for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:38:35 +0100 (CET) List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Mark Brown , Lars-Peter Clausen , "tiwai@suse.de" , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Mark, I have one question and need your suggestion. Thanks in advance. In our DSP, one stream path is like this: There is one bit controlling whether a signal A goes to A_out or B_out. That's the reverse case of DAPM_MUX(multiple inputs, single output). One way is to use two switches but it seems not good since two switches control the same bit. It's strange. Do you have any opinion about such requirement support? -- Best Regards Qiao