From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41099) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVCzc-0004W9-MI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:46:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVCzZ-0007dh-DB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:46:12 -0400 Received: from v220110690675601.yourvserver.net ([37.221.199.173]:39291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVCzZ-0007dO-72 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 01:46:09 -0400 Message-ID: <54FE851D.5070102@weilnetz.de> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:46:05 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201503091502.11484.wpaul@windriver.com> <54FE1D68.1050709@weilnetz.de> <201503091546.39617.wpaul@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <201503091546.39617.wpaul@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fix for incorrect SYSRET instruction implementation -- anyone looked at this yet? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bill Paul Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel , Richard Henderson Please see my comment below. Am 09.03.2015 um 23:46 schrieb Bill Paul: > Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Stefan Weil had to > walk into mine at 15:23:36 on Monday 09 March 2015 and say: > >> Hi Bill, >> >> sending text only e-mails might help. Usually git send-email is better >> than using KMail or other mail software. > You know, I thought I was sending in plain text. Somewhere along the line > KMail lied to me. Even when using plain text, mailing programs will often wrap lines and or do other nasty things. Create your patch with "git format-patch", add optional personal comments after the ---, use scripts/get_maintainer.pl and scripts/checkpatch.pl on your patch, and then send it with "git send-email". > >> Use tools like git gui to get a correct signature. Any optional personal >> comments should come directly after >> the line with ---. > After? Or before? See http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/447644/for an example. >> Could you please re-send your patch? Check it before >> sending with scripts/checkpatch.pl. >> >> Maybe this looks like much regulations to fix a bug, but some rules are >> necessary to keep a project >> like QEMU alive. > I'm going to send it once more because it was entirely my fault that my stupid > mailer kept sending in HTML mode, but that's it. > > -Bill Cheers Stefan