All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <a.ryabinin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: sched: divide error in sg_capacity_factor
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 06:55:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FECDAE.1070205@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150310042959.GA8591@gmail.com>

On 03/10/2015 12:29 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> While fuzzing with trinity inside the latest -next kernel using trinity I've stumbled on:
>>
>> [  936.784266] divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
>> [  936.793957] RIP: find_busiest_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:6152 kernel/sched/fair.c:6223 kernel/sched/fair.c:6341 kernel/sched/fair.c:6603)
> 
> Hm, these line numbers don't seem to match up very well with my 
> version of linux-next:
> 
>   28855005be1d Add linux-next specific files for 20150306
> 
> and the Git version info included in the oops seems useless:
> 
>   4.0.0-rc1-sasha-00044-ge21109a
> 
>   $ git log e21109a
>   fatal: ambiguous argument 'e21109a': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
> 
> I think the kernel's SHA1 should be made at least 12 char wide, 
> regardless of the user's gitconfig::core.abbrev settings.
> 
> Also, latest linux-next is -rc2 based, while your version string says 
> -rc1.
> 
>> [  936.829403] load_balance (kernel/sched/fair.c:6857)
> 
> this does not match up either.
> 
>> [  936.829403] run_rebalance_domains (kernel/sched/fair.c:7494 kernel/sched/fair.c:7659)
> 
> The line numbers are not even close to anything related: 
> run_rebalance_domains() starts at line 7666 and ends at 7680.

Right, this is my fuck up. It seems that I was fuzzing 4.0-rc1 rather than
-next as I thought I was. I forgot to go back to -next after I tested a few
things on Linus's tree.

So the line numbers should match correctly with Linus's tree as you've already
guessed below.

> Also, why are the offsets into the function missing from the output? 
> Those would allow the rough determination of the crash site, even if 
> debuginfo is crap.

I found that offsets are useless here because of the really odd things the
compiler does based on my config. There's so many things that got inlined
in this case that I think offsets wouldn't mean anything to you here.

For example, in this case the division by 0 happened on load_balance+0x88a/0x2399.

> I also checked Linus's latest, and they do seem to match up better:
> 
>   affb8172de39 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
> 
> and the line number gives:
> 
>         capacity_factor = min_t(unsigned,
>                 capacity_factor, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(capacity, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE));
> 
> but that's a division with a constant? Should not trap.
> 
> So I rebuild a kernel with debug info, pattern matched the disassembly 
> you provided, and that gave me this division:
> 
> (gdb) list *0xffffffff8107d958
> 0xffffffff8107d958 is in find_busiest_group (kernel/sched/fair.c:6162).
> 6157            capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
> 6158            capacity_orig = group->sgc->capacity_orig;
> 6159            cpus = group->group_weight;
> 6160
> 6161            /* smt := ceil(cpus / capacity), assumes: 1 < smt_capacity < 2 */
> 6162            smt = DIV_ROUND_UP(SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE * cpus, capacity_orig);
> 6163            capacity_factor = cpus / smt; /* cores */
> 6164
> 6165            capacity_factor = min_t(unsigned,
> 6166                    capacity_factor, DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(capacity, SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE));

This is the division I was seeing as well.

> So this too seems not very plausible: 'capacity_orig' comes straight 
> from group->sgc->capacity_orig, which is:
> 
>  - boot time initialized
> 
>  - sometimes recalculated during CPU hot-plug: not sure how much of 
>    that your tests are doing?

I'm not forcing them, but they do happen pretty often.

>  - but otherwise it's fairly constant and should have crashed your 
>    system early on if it was set up wrong
> 
> unless I missed something that is.
> 
>> [  936.829403] __do_softirq (kernel/softirq.c:273 include/linux/jump_label.h:114 include/trace/events/irq.h:126 kernel/softirq.c:274)
>> [  936.829403] irq_exit (kernel/softirq.c:350 kernel/softirq.c:391)
>> [  936.829403] smp_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:918)
>> [  936.829403] apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:958)
>> [  936.829403]  <EOI>
>> [  936.829403] print_context_stack (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:105)
>> [  936.829403] dump_trace (arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c:244)
>> [  936.829403] save_stack_trace (arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c:64)
>> [  936.829403] __set_page_owner (mm/page_owner.c:72)
>> [  936.829403] get_page_from_freelist (include/linux/page_owner.h:26 mm/page_alloc.c:2176)
>> [  936.829403] __alloc_pages_nodemask (mm/page_alloc.c:2844)
>> [  936.829403] alloc_pages_vma (mm/mempolicy.c:2007)
>> [  936.829403] handle_mm_fault (mm/memory.c:2156 mm/memory.c:3164 mm/memory.c:3269 mm/memory.c:3298)
>> [  936.829403] __do_page_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1235)
>> [  936.829403] trace_do_page_fault (arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1329)
>> [  936.829403] do_async_page_fault (arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c:280)
>> [  936.829403] async_page_fault (arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:1295)
> 
> So debug info weirdnesses aside, other divisions in 
> find_busiest_group():
> 
>         sds.avg_load = (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE * sds.total_load)
>                                                 / sds.total_capacity;
> 
> total_capacity ought to be zero only on a totally borked machine 
> (unlikely to boot), or on memory corruption.
> 
> if calculate_imbalance() got inlined, then:
> 
>                 load_above_capacity /= busiest->group_capacity;
> 
> that too ought to only get corrupted in the most serious cases, we 
> don't recalculate it runtime.
> 
> So I'm baffled. Some tentative handwaving, pointing away from the 
> scheduler:
> 
>  - Your stack trace is 'weird' not just due to debug info: an async 
>    page fault doing allocations, doing a stack trace, interruted by a 
>    timer irq, doing scheduler rebalancing...

Yeah, it's not the most straightforward trace, but it's not "broken" -
it's a plausible scenario.

>  - The (spectacularly misnamed [*] ) CONFIG_PAGE_OWNER=y page lifetime
>    tracing facility got enabled explicitly via the page_owner=on boot 
>    parameter, right? Not many people are doing that I suspect.

Right. But all it did here was save a stack trace, no?

>  - CONFIG_KASAN=y is enabled in your kernel. New, invasive option, 
>    using compiler features that weren't used by kernel code before.

Agreed, I've Cc'ed Andrey and hope that he could see if there's anything
up with the assembly that's fishy.

>  - async page faults are virtualization specials: not used much 
>    elsewhere.
> 
>  - There's a 'W' taint in your oops. Probably some harmless prior
>    warning?

Yup, just one of my debug patches that helps me track down a different
bug.

> So your crash signature has the combination of 3 'uncommon' kernel 
> features, and a scheduler crash with a relatively constant value that 
> should never be zero and which should crash everywhere.
> 
> So right now I'd blame the other 3 guys, I wasn't even there that 
> night, officer!

Fair enough, I've only seen it once myself so I can ignore it until (if)
I hit it again.

Sorry again about the tree mixup. I'll go back to fuzzing -next now :)


Thanks,
Sasha

> Cc:-ed others as well.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
> 
> [*] Please name debugging features accordingly: CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGE_OWNER.
>     Maybe even prefix them with the subsystem: CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_PAGE_OWNER.
> 
>     We already have a nice set of CONFIG_DEBUG_VM* options:
> 
>       CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
>       CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_RB
>       CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_VMACACHE
> 
>     Also, there's no penalty for including a verb, so that people know 
>     wth it's doing, at a glance: CONFIG_DEBUG_VM_TRACK_PAGE_OWNER?
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2015-03-10 10:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-09 17:46 sched: divide error in sg_capacity_factor Sasha Levin
2015-03-10  4:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-10 10:55   ` Sasha Levin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54FECDAE.1070205@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=a.ryabinin@samsung.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.