From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Display IO topology when PXM data is
 available (plus some cleanup)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:39:51 -0400
Message-ID: <54FEF427.8020904@oracle.com>
References: <1425954475-4913-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
	<54FEB76A0200007800067E51@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <54FEB76A0200007800067E51@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, dario.faggioli@citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, keir@xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 03/10/2015 04:20 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 10.03.15 at 03:27, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Changes in v4:
>> * Split cputopology and NUMA info changes into separate patches
>> * Added patch#1 (partly because patch#4 needs to know when when distance is invalid,
>>    i.e. NUMA_NO_DISTANCE)
>> * Split sysctl version update into a separate patch
> Why?

Which patch should it go to then? The first that changed the interfaces 
(patch#3) or the second (#4)?

-boris