From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 15:25:10 +0100 Message-ID: <54FEFEC6.2080904@dachary.org> References: <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AA6CEB8@g01jpexmbyt24> <54E1B57F.3070201@dachary.org> <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AA9678C@g01jpexmbyt24> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sAjlW79ciFSHdJOUpBRPvgaAXFHGt0GXP" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:55863 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752977AbbCJOZO (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 10:25:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <870DE8DBB716524BAE51B2D499EC81E40AA9678C@g01jpexmbyt24> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Miyamae, Takeshi" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" Cc: "Shiozawa, Kensuke" , "Nakao, Takanori" , "Kaga, Yoshihiro" , "Kawaguchi, Shotaro" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sAjlW79ciFSHdJOUpBRPvgaAXFHGt0GXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi ! On 10/03/2015 11:35, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: > Dear Loic, >=20 > I really apologize that our reply is too late. > Since removing experimental flag from SHEC at v0.94 is our immediate ho= pe, we should > have started any actions for that earlier. No worries, it's never too late to do good :-) > By the way, you mean we must add just the same workaround as 10887 for = SHEC > if our target is Hammer. > Is my understanding correct ? What is needed is integration tests running during a few weeks and showin= g the plugin behaves well.=20 >> Running teuthology locally is non trivial, maybe we can provide you wi= th access to the >> community lab so that you can run teuthology suites against the existi= ng teuthology cluster >> (i.e. http://pulpito.ceph.com/). Would you like me to ask ? >=20 > Thank you for your proposal. > It would be greatly helpful if we were allowed to use it ! Could you please connect to irc.oftc.net#sepia ? This is the IRC channel = where lab related matters are discussed. We can figure out the details th= ere.=20 In the meantime you can try teuthology and write a single test quite easi= ly, on your local machine. The tricky part comes where we want to run sui= tes with large number of jobs. You can adapt the instructions from http:/= /dachary.org/?p=3D2204 to your local environment. All you need really is = the ability to run two virtual machines. Cheers >=20 > Best regards, > Takeshi Miyamae >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Loic Dachary [mailto:loic@dachary.org]=20 > Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 6:17 PM > To: Miyamae, Takeshi/=E5=AE=AE=E5=89=8D =E5=89=9B; ceph-devel@vger.kern= el.org > Cc: Shiozawa, Kensuke/=E5=A1=A9=E6=B2=A2 =E8=B3=A2=E8=BC=94; Nakao, Tak= anori/=E4=B8=AD=E5=B0=BE =E9=B7=B9=E8=A9=94 > Subject: Re: conditions for removing experimental feature marks >=20 > Hi, >=20 > On 16/02/2015 08:37, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: >> Dear Loic, >> >> Thank you for your help on the pull request of SHEC last week. >> We believe that marking experimental feature on SHEC was inevitable=20 >> and the way to restrict the feature is proper. >> >> By the way, could you let us know what are the conditions for removing= =20 >> experimental feature marks in the future? >> Are additional thorough tests required? >=20 > The next step is to run integration tests with the shec plugin. The int= egration tests have shown that the shec plugin does not disrupt anything.= Now we should check if it works properly under stress and upgrades. I cr= eated two tickets for that purpose: >=20 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10886 : integration / theuthology integr= ation / theuthology thrasher tests for the shec erasure code plugin > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10887 : erasure-code: allow upgrades for= shec plugins >=20 > It would be fantastic if you could work on http://tracker.ceph.com/issu= es/7291 : it would make the integration of new erasure code plugins easie= r. I realize that it is infrastructure work not directly of interest to t= he shec plugin implementation. >=20 > Running teuthology locally is non trivial, maybe we can provide you wit= h access to the community lab so that you can run teuthology suites again= st the existing teuthology cluster (i.e. http://pulpito.ceph.com/). Would= you like me to ask ?=20 >=20 > Cheers >=20 >> Best regards, >> Takeshi Miyamae >> >=20 > -- > Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >=20 > N=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDr=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDy=EF=BF= =BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDb=EF=BF=BDX=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=C7=A7v=EF=BF=BD^=EF=BF= =BD)=DE=BA{.n=EF=BF=BD+=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDz=EF=BF=BD]z=EF=BF=BD=EF= =BF=BD=EF=BF=BD{ay=EF=BF=BD=1D=CA=87=DA=99=EF=BF=BD,j=07=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD= f=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDh=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDz=EF=BF=BD=1E=EF=BF= =BDw=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=0C=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDj:+v=EF=BF=BD= =EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDw=EF=BF=BDj=EF=BF=BDm=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD= =07=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BDzZ+=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF= =BD=EF=BF=BD=DD=A2j"=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD!tml=3D >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --sAjlW79ciFSHdJOUpBRPvgaAXFHGt0GXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlT+/sYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F20toACfdrpXw5DUm6aQPcYRHqrhLO41 Ke8AniFWUYNp2ioqlP+5t+QdhTlz0oha =8i+E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sAjlW79ciFSHdJOUpBRPvgaAXFHGt0GXP--