From: Thomas Hellstrom <thomas@shipmail.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Device loses its IRQ number on driver unload?
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 07:40:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54FFE358.406@shipmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM=9tzy858jNOScFy8eN2J1WHu-jhe36UziJUV3tXkqJsWWEg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/10/2015 10:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 10 March 2015 at 22:55, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> wrote:
>> On 03/09/2015 09:25 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> On 10 March 2015 at 02:02, Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> wrote:
>>>> On 03/09/2015 04:22 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:04:01AM +0100, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure this started with 4.0 but when I rmmod the device driver
>>>>>> like so
>>>>>> rmmod vmwgfx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The device loses its IRQ line as shown in lscpi:
>>>>>> Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64 <irq missing here>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and a subsequent modprobe will fail since pdev->irq is 0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anyone else seeing this with other drivers?
>>>>> I seen occasionally (over the past couple of kernels) random zeros in pdev
>>>>> but dismissed it as broken machines or bugs in i915 (we have them ...).
>>>>> Usually the box died chasing a NULL pointer from pdev. Otherwise no.
>>>>> -Daniel
>>>> OK. Thanks for the info. Since in my case this is 100% reproducible I
>>>> guess I have an excellent opportunity to bisect the problem :-/
>>>>
>>> does lspci -H1, or some option like to direct access hw show it?
>>>
>>> just whether this is the kernel copy or the hw register getting messed up.
>>>
>>> Dave.
>> Hi, Dave,
>>
>> lspci -H1 indeed shows the IRQ number. It turns out that the commit
>> introduced in 4.0 breaking this is
>>
>> b4b55cda587442477a3a9f0669e26bba4b7800c0 is the first bad commit
>> commit b4b55cda587442477a3a9f0669e26bba4b7800c0
>> Author: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
>> Date: Thu Feb 5 13:44:47 2015 +0800
>>
>> x86/PCI: Refine the way to release PCI IRQ resources
>>
>>
>> It's obvious from the commit message that unloading the driver *should*
>> drop the irq resource but its not
>> obvious what's reallocating that resource on driver load...
>>
>> Anyway, it turns out that adding a
>> pci_disable_device(pdev) in the pci driver's remove() method
>> (vmw_remove() in my case) appears to fix the problem:
>> The device irq is removed on driver unload and enabled again on driver
>> load There appears to be no pci_disable_device() on driver exit in core drm.
> Yes that is because at one time pre kms if you pci disabled the VGA device,
> bad things would happen.
>
> I think with modesetting driver it shouldn't be a problem anymore.
>
> Dave.
So what's the preferred remedy here? should I file a bug against the
above commit or should we go ahead modifying
the DRM drivers?
Thanks,
Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-09 10:04 Device loses its IRQ number on driver unload? Thomas Hellstrom
2015-03-09 15:22 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-09 16:02 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2015-03-09 20:25 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-10 12:55 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2015-03-10 14:01 ` Alex Deucher
2015-03-10 21:05 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-11 6:40 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2015-03-11 7:22 ` Dave Airlie
2015-03-11 9:28 ` Thomas Hellstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54FFE358.406@shipmail.org \
--to=thomas@shipmail.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.