From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8686BCD342F for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vJEsn-0008Hm-R3; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:43:49 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vJEqN-0004ny-16 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:41:31 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1vJEqK-0002Fl-I5 for qemu-arm@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:41:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1762969275; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q5BID2g4Ux0itV/YP5INGMeHDUmnM90k7s0Z4ua4VjY=; b=XYBd+LPyIJwxXgODuMwwZrTi/dbX9I7dmjTgZLFZXJ40mDanBlhzybVEaX9OJc/odTaNHe jf8HwBnneHaFch6ScsLUzU5u/ksncfg67mkR41NkkZ8TRpYBdOqBk2wG4fnYxMoVOQrIoM YHFil07OSm81s7n/V0gXlH/w9mrVN7g= Received: from mail-pj1-f71.google.com (mail-pj1-f71.google.com [209.85.216.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-659-LG4RciUuNOiH5e5D1XsGww-1; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:41:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: LG4RciUuNOiH5e5D1XsGww-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: LG4RciUuNOiH5e5D1XsGww_1762969273 Received: by mail-pj1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-341cd35b0f3so1172315a91.0 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:41:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762969273; x=1763574073; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Q5BID2g4Ux0itV/YP5INGMeHDUmnM90k7s0Z4ua4VjY=; b=VHXP94V0JQZLrFcTjgkQsBnWGGhXofJH07Z2jIiMYZ7ohgG5hRonxbVTZcTDjfXmyK MSe77i38UYClBg5NCYkllcaYC2jLg3Tj6KirAsfKOeOLANk0SCRmH0Wux2cTs6OibAh+ 71/nUwf2Wk2yBefwP28f/RlJZGZ6ue2LfCbI7b7M6SGQYp2otebaUG1DB7MYWvCebqVn YCKCGB1JtsQWCGxTCIu82/vqA8YDO5cU2hGccKs35aIN2TitwKKcAIZwWKi5JndE2Pih q6d75HlmF0PNbNjgVAcHcq7M0yuguuZjssVeoQvGe7GQTL3t/XxsABXN5w4f4rKd4WKv Z6wg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw34DswIWrDILSOR9DKIVlN7Q7OtPnDnMquviayIgaBTZG/XeRw 3U9wFBa6BzdRURrS24krVoMfn4nSD+QlOolrzE57B6TeKGuzgrDrbgL8Jrh7D1Ml93xCYljuTX5 BEX7VR+Yxy7lh9D3tmz5eh78vBAqgRfXEryYqZI62B2kA/mOvhGD7XQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct35zc6+4JTf3zER/8zQf72oFnGUs91o/yBLLNPVSEIVdLdojvKtOQnCXdNsf/ hRlh4RTROrSDw72eku6Qln1EHXONZawj5wCh+pbbhU2cRxf7knjf8BDkyyNy6rQJ644CLPD8wBQ oHDTAf+R5l/jDbp7pzAyTCz7kE0D4A3jCJpVk9PQ/iQBaGi82QngtFuwIXgGYgetOcehCfl3CR6 iynO5O5eUQ1jLbYwcKc3ejZOMOfkONvpLsmQ0dvlqMHkRR4j91kv3bK72wbKHHrKRp1cO1ltKek 63W703MuG2OziWvSEF/5IwK5n/9QtUWU86QfkLd82OHQb88bN3Fm8HLv1+3zQvCyZVPDklbon+8 Cp/rifyI7AyfsxJUKyJ34VCsNds1MUFcyn1hivoU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:562c:b0:343:89cc:6f23 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-343eacba165mr202044a91.14.1762969273165; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:41:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFI1rQsfYV8cSqEvqIVKqykhD1/MtJpAXyaLqrFfKmq7jNBv0vTUJM4AlqkZ+dXLPg01GJ7Pg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:562c:b0:343:89cc:6f23 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-343eacba165mr202023a91.14.1762969272799; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:41:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.68.51] (n175-34-62-5.mrk21.qld.optusnet.com.au. [175.34.62.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-343eac7ec56sm48384a91.10.2025.11.12.09.41.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:41:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54de65b4-6ba3-474a-b9b2-e128cfc9f2ef@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 03:41:06 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] acpi/ghes: Increase GHES raw data maximal length to 4KiB To: Igor Mammedov Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org, gengdongjiu1@gmail.com, mst@redhat.com, anisinha@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com References: <20251105114453.2164073-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20251105114453.2164073-3-gshan@redhat.com> <20251110151107.5e825ea0@fedora> <20251112133217.41cc6df8@fedora> From: Gavin Shan In-Reply-To: <20251112133217.41cc6df8@fedora> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: vgKpDskkqwMdQSm4y5WgSakuzxUANobSbgbLzl2nzq0_1762969273 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=gshan@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-arm@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-arm-bounces+qemu-arm=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Hi Igor, On 11/12/25 10:32 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:05:23 +1000 > Gavin Shan wrote: >> On 11/11/25 12:11 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 21:44:47 +1000 >>> Gavin Shan wrote: >>> >>>> The current GHES raw data maximal length isn't enough for 16 consecutive >>>> CPER errors, which will be sent to a guest with 4KiB page size on a >>>> erroneous 64KiB host page. Note those 16 CPER errors will be contained >>>> in one single error block, meaning all CPER errors should be identical >>>> in terms of type and severity and all of them should be delivered in >>>> one shot. >>>> >>>> Increase GHES raw data maximal length from 1KiB to 4KiB so that the >>>> error block has enough storage space for 16 consecutive CPER errors. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan >>>> --- >>>> docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst | 2 +- >>>> hw/acpi/ghes.c | 2 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst b/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst >>>> index aaf7b1ad11..acf31d6eeb 100644 >>>> --- a/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst >>>> +++ b/docs/specs/acpi_hest_ghes.rst >>>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Design Details >>>> and N Read Ack Register entries. The size for each entry is 8-byte. >>>> The Error Status Data Block table contains N Error Status Data Block >>>> entries. The size for each entry is defined at the source code as >>>> - ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH (currently 1024 bytes). The total size >>>> + ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH (currently 4096 bytes). The total size >>> >>> is it safe to bump without compat glue? >>> >>> consider VM migrated from old QEMU to new one, >>> it will have etc/hardware_errors allocated with 1K GESB, >>> and more importantly error_block_addressN will have 1K offsets as well >>> >>> however with ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH all length checks will >>> let >1K blocks to be written into into 1K 'formated' etc/hardware_errors. >>> >>> Thanks to previous refactoring we get all addresses right (1K version), >>> but if you write large GESB there it will either overlap with the next GESB >>> or a smaller GESB might overwrite tail of preceding large one. >>> And in works case it's OOB when writing large GESB in the last block. >>> >>> Given we have to write GESB successfully or abort, there is no point >>> in adding compat knobs. But we still need to check if GEBS will fit into >>> whatever block size etc/hardware_errors inside guest RAM is laid out originally. >>> >> >> Good point. You're right that we're not safe for migration from old QEMU to >> and new QEMU. So I think I need to bump vmstate_hest_state::minimum_version_id >> in generic_event_device.c ? > > that won't help, > what would help is creating compat property (in the owner of GHES MMIO registers), > and lower limits (to former value) for older machine types. > That way sizes would match even if you do ping pong migration > between old qemu and new one, since one would still be using old machine type > for that. > In v4, a compat property 'x-error-block-size' has been added, as the fence between QEMU 10.1 and 10.2 (1KiB vs 4KiB GHES error block size). https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-arm/2025-11/msg00534.html >> >> >>>> for the "etc/hardware_errors" fw_cfg blob is >>>> (N * 8 * 2 + N * ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH) bytes. >>>> N is the number of the kinds of hardware error sources. >>>> diff --git a/hw/acpi/ghes.c b/hw/acpi/ghes.c >>>> index 06555905ce..a9c08e73c0 100644 >>>> --- a/hw/acpi/ghes.c >>>> +++ b/hw/acpi/ghes.c >>>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ >>>> #define ACPI_HEST_ADDR_FW_CFG_FILE "etc/acpi_table_hest_addr" >>>> >>>> /* The max size in bytes for one error block */ >>>> -#define ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH (1 * KiB) >>>> +#define ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH (4 * KiB) >>>> >>>> /* Generic Hardware Error Source version 2 */ >>>> #define ACPI_GHES_SOURCE_GENERIC_ERROR_V2 10 >> Thanks, Gavin