Re: [PATCH v7 28/45] arm64: rme: support RSI_HOST_CALL

[Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>]

On 04/03/2025 06:01, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 2/14/25 2:14 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>> From: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
>>
>> Forward RSI_HOST_CALLS to KVM's HVC handler.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v4:
>>   * Setting GPRS is now done by kvm_rec_enter() rather than
>>     rec_exit_host_call() (see previous patch - arm64: RME: Handle realm
>>     enter/exit). This fixes a bug where the registers set by user space
>>     were being ignored.
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/rme-exit.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme-exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme-exit.c
>> index c785005f821f..4f7602aa3c6c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rme-exit.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rme-exit.c
>> @@ -107,6 +107,26 @@ static int rec_exit_ripas_change(struct kvm_vcpu
>> *vcpu)
>>       return -EFAULT;
>>   }
>>   +static int rec_exit_host_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +    int ret, i;
>> +    struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>> +
>> +    vcpu->stat.hvc_exit_stat++;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < REC_RUN_GPRS; i++)
>> +        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, i, rec->run->exit.gprs[i]);
>> +
>> +    ret = kvm_smccc_call_handler(vcpu);
>> +
>> +    if (ret < 0) {
>> +        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
>> +        ret = 1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> I don't understand how a negative error can be returned from
> kvm_smccc_call_handler().

I don't believe it really can. However kvm_smccc_call_handler() calls
kvm_psci_call() and that has a documentation block which states:

 * This function returns: > 0 (success), 0 (success but exit to user
 * space), and < 0 (errors)
 *
 * Errors:
 * -EINVAL: Unrecognized PSCI function

But I can't actually see code which returns the negative value...

> Besides, SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED has been set to GPR[0 - 3] if the
> request can't be
> supported. Why we need to set GPR[0] to ~0UL, which corresponds to
> SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED
> if I'm correct. I guess change log or a comment to explain the questions
> would be
> nice.

I'll add a comment explaining we don't expect negative codes. And I'll
expand ~0UL to SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED which is what it should be.

Thanks,
Steve

>>   static void update_arch_timer_irq_lines(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   {
>>       struct realm_rec *rec = &vcpu->arch.rec;
>> @@ -168,6 +188,8 @@ int handle_rec_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int
>> rec_run_ret)
>>           return rec_exit_psci(vcpu);
>>       case RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE:
>>           return rec_exit_ripas_change(vcpu);
>> +    case RMI_EXIT_HOST_CALL:
>> +        return rec_exit_host_call(vcpu);
>>       }
>>         kvm_pr_unimpl("Unsupported exit reason: %u\n",
> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
>