All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/chv: Set min freq to efficient frequency on chv
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:23:48 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550048EC.6010106@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150226161229.GE20682@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>



On Thursday 26 February 2015 09:42 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:46:56PM +0530, deepak.s@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> After feedback from the hardware team, now we set the GPU min freq to RPe.
>> If we drop the freq to RPn, we found that the punit was not setting the
>> voltage to Vnn, So recommendation is to set min freq to RPe.
> And does it change the voltage at all?

Yes Voltage does change when we drop to RPe

> Is there really any advantage to
> the extra code on idle?Does efficient_freq really consume less power
> than min_freq when active (assuming a min_freq/efficient_freq busy
> workload i.e. does a workload that would be 100% busy at min_freq
> consume less power when run at efficient_freq)?

The delta voltage usage between RPn and RPe is very small like close to zero.
Also, if we run workload 100% busy at Rpe we get better performance without much of voltage loss right?
btw, Punit expects us to operate between Rpe & RP0.

> -Chris
>

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-26 15:16 [PATCH 0/5] CHV PM fix & Improvements deepak.s
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/i915/chv: Remove Wait for a previous gfx force-off deepak.s
2015-02-26 15:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-02-26 15:42     ` Deepak S
2015-03-11 14:50       ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Re-adjusting rc6 promotional timer for chv deepak.s
2015-03-23 19:43   ` Paulo Zanoni
2015-03-24  3:05     ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/i915/chv: Set min freq to efficient frequency on chv deepak.s
2015-02-26 16:12   ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 13:53     ` Deepak S [this message]
2015-03-11 14:06       ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 14:29         ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Modifying RC6 Promotion timer for Media workloads deepak.s
2015-02-26 16:08   ` Chris Wilson
2015-02-27  2:53     ` Deepak S
2015-03-05 15:57       ` [PATCH v2] " deepak.s
2015-03-06 16:40         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-11 13:37           ` Deepak S
2015-03-11 13:56             ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-11 13:59               ` Deepak S
2015-02-26 15:16 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Setup static bias for GPU deepak.s
2015-02-28 15:23   ` shuang.he

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550048EC.6010106@linux.intel.com \
    --to=deepak.s@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.