From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] EEE support for mv88e6172 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:41:31 -0700 Message-ID: <5501978B.10308@roeck-us.net> References: <1426025160-13992-1-git-send-email-andrew@lunn.ch> <20150311.165931.2141833376642325076.davem@davemloft.net> <55015248.9090103@roeck-us.net> <20150312121416.GF14112@lunn.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Lunn Return-path: Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:43287 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932332AbbCLNlg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:41:36 -0400 Received: from mailnull by bh-25.webhostbox.net with sa-checked (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YW3Mk-002GuD-M9 for netdev@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:41:34 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20150312121416.GF14112@lunn.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/12/2015 05:14 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:46:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 03/11/2015 01:59 PM, David Miller wrote: >>> From: Andrew Lunn >>> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:05:56 +0100 >>> >>>> This patchset contains two cleanups and then adds EEE support >>>> to the mv88e6172, using the base provided by Guenter Roeck >>>> >>>> Tested on a WRT1900AC with mv88e6172 and DIR665 with mv88e6171. >>> >>> This series does not apply cleanly to net-next. >>> >>> I really want to discourage you posting patches against trees other >>> that net and net-next like this, without CLEARLY marking in the >>> Subject lines that this patch series is special and that I should >>> not try to review and apply it at all. >>> >> >> Andrew, > > Yes, i messed up :-( > >> I see two options: I can submit my entire series of HW bridging >> patches for mv88e6xxx, or I submit the introductory patches of that >> series (the ones refactoring the code to prepare for HW bridging) >> plus your (rebased) patches on top of it. >> >> What do you think ? > > There is no rush with these patches. When you are ready, post the > whole hardware bridge patches for review. Once they are accepted, i > will try again with the EEE patches for mv88e6171. > Ok. Did you have time to test the bridging code ? Thanks, Guenter