All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Niels Wellens <niels.wellens@triphase.com>,
	"xenomai@xenomai.org" <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai] xeno3_rc3_alchemy What is the effect of rt_task_delete on a RT_SEM?
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 19:30:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55032CCB.3010607@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426262234.3156.18.camel@triphase.com>

On 2015-03-13 16:57, Niels Wellens wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> While porting our code to xeno3 I noticed that one of our tasks blocked
> on a semaphore during exit (code worked on xeno 2.6.4 Native, some small
> changes where needed for Alchemy but nothing fundamental). It seems that
> deletion of a task that is waiting on a RT_SEM doesn't decrement the
> nwaiters field of the semaphore. Afterwards, when I raise the semaphore,
> the nwaiters decrement without releasing an existing task. Are there
> some changes here in Xeno3? I looked in the migration guide but the only
> remark about semaphores is for posix.
> 
> Please find in attachment a small working example with some comments in
> the exit part of the code.

I've pushed two related patches to
http://git.xenomai.org/xenomai-jki.git/log/?h=for-forge. The first one
fixes the semaphore value after interrupted waiting as you saw it, the
second one the reported nwaiters value if the semaphore is positive
(unrelated but caught by your test case as well).

Thanks for reporting and specifically for preparing the test case that well!

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-13 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-13 15:57 [Xenomai] xeno3_rc3_alchemy What is the effect of rt_task_delete on a RT_SEM? Niels Wellens
2015-03-13 18:30 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2015-03-15 16:22   ` Philippe Gerum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55032CCB.3010607@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=niels.wellens@triphase.com \
    --cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.