From: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
To: Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Any Arguments for/against --bind mounts?
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:26:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5503AA56.4050407@pobox.com> (raw)
Is there any practical reason to prefer bind mounts or separately
mounting a subvolume?
e.g. assuming /locationA and /locationB are arbitrarily far apart in the
file system tree, is there any reason to prefer one of the following
over the other
mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationA
mount --bind /locationA /locationB
vs.
mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationA
mount -t btrfs -o subvolume=/thing /dev/sdN1 /locationB
Are both equally efficient and whatnot?
next reply other threads:[~2015-03-14 2:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-14 3:26 Robert White [this message]
2015-03-14 17:34 ` Any Arguments for/against --bind mounts? Austin S Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5503AA56.4050407@pobox.com \
--to=rwhite@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.