From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
donald.d.dugger@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 12:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55041EBD.90601@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150313194518.GI3513@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
Am 13.03.2015 um 20:45 schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:25:19PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Only thing that comes to mind is whether it might make sense to
>> hierarchically make Broadwell the parent type of Broadwell-noTSX, to
>> avoid duplication. But then again we already have a lot of it. ;)
>
> The builtin_x86_defs[] table has no way to represent inheritance,
> currently. Maybe one day when we move everything inside class_init
> functions. :)
If x86_cpu_compat_set_features(), x86_cpu_list() and
arch_query_cpu_definitions() get fixed to no longer operate on the old
builtin_x86_defs[] but on object_class_foreach() or similar functions,
then you can register special CPU types in x86_cpu_register_types(),
like we do for the KVM host type already.
In this case I imagined a custom class_init with an &= ~... operation.
But I wasn't aware we're still using the array in so many places! :/
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Jennifer Guild, Dilip Upmanyu,
Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-14 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 19:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "target-i386: Disable HLE and RTM on Haswell & Broadwell" Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-19 18:02 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-19 18:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Andreas Färber
2015-03-13 19:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-14 11:42 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55041EBD.90601@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.