Re: [PATCH v3 0/3]: bug fixes in the ixgbe PF PMD Rx flow

[Vlad Zolotarov <vladz-RmZWMc9puTNJc61us3aD9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>]

On 03/13/15 15:03, Vladislav Zolotarov wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 13, 2015 2:51 PM, "Ananyev, Konstantin" 
> <konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <mailto:konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Vlad,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Vlad Zolotarov [mailto:vladz-RmZWMc9puTNJc61us3aD9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org 
> <mailto:vladz-RmZWMc9puTNJc61us3aD9laTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>]
> > > Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:52 AM
> > > To: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3]: bug fixes in the ixgbe PF 
> PMD Rx flow
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 03/13/15 13:07, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org 
> <mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov
> > > >> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:17 PM
> > > >> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
> > > >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3]: bug fixes in the ixgbe PF 
> PMD Rx flow
> > > >>
> > > >> This series contains some bug fixes that were found during my 
> work on the ixgbe LRO
> > > >> patches. Sending this series separately on Thomas request so 
> that it may be integrated
> > > >> into the 2.0 release.
> > > >>
> > > >> New in v3:
> > > >>     - Adjusted to the new structs naming in the master.
> > > >>     - Fixed rx_bulk_alloc_allowed and rx_vec_allowed 
> initialization:
> > > >>        - Don't set them to FALSE in rte_eth_dev_stop() flow - 
> the following
> > > >>          rte_eth_dev_start() will need them.
> > > >>        - Reset them to TRUE in rte_eth_dev_configure() and not 
> in a probe() flow.
> > > >>          This will ensure the proper behaviour if port is 
> re-configured.
> > > >>     - Rename:
> > > >>        - ixgbe_rx_vec_condition_check() -> 
> ixgbe_rx_vec_dev_conf_condition_check()
> > > >>        - set_rx_function() -> ixgbe_set_rx_function()
> > > >>     - Clean up the logic in ixgbe_set_rx_function().
> > > >>     - Define stubs with __attribute__((weak)) instead of using 
> #ifdef's.
> > > >>     - Styling: beautify ixgbe_rxtx.h a bit.
> > > >>
> > > >> New in v2:
> > > >>     - Fixed a compilation failure.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Vlad Zolotarov (3):
> > > >>    ixgbe: Use the rte_le_to_cpu_xx()/rte_cpu_to_le_xx() when
> > > >>      reading/setting HW ring descriptor fields
> > > >>    ixgbe: Bug fix: Properly configure Rx CRC stripping for x540 
> devices
> > > >>    ixgbe: Unify the rx_pkt_bulk callback initialization
> > > >>
> > > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h |  2 +
> > > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c     | 13 +-
> > > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c       | 216 
> +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.h       | 28 ++++-
> > > >>   lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec.c   |  2 +-
> > > >>   5 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
> > > >>
> > > > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org 
> <mailto:konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>>
> > > >
> > > > Just one nit:
> > > >
> > > > +int __attribute__((weak)) ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(
> > > > +   struct ixgbe_rx_queue __rte_unused *rxq)
> > > > +{
> > > >
> > > > Please use notation:
> > > > int __attribute__((weak))
> > > > ixgbe_rxq_vec_setup(struct ixgbe_rx_queue __rte_unused *rxq)
> > > >
> > > > To keep up with the rest of the code, plus makes much easier to 
> read.
> > >
> > > I took an example from kni/ethtool/igb/kcompat.h for a template but no
> > > problem.
> > > Do u want me to respin or it's ok? I will use this format for the
> > > follow-up LRO patch anyway...
> >
> > Doing that in LRO patch set is ok.
> > No need for respin that one, I think.
>
> Great! Thanks a lot for reviewing this.
>
> Thomas, it seems like ixgbe maintainer gives this series a green 
> light!.. ;)
>

Ping.
Thomas, could u, pls., consider  applying this series to at least the 
upstream master?

thanks in advance,
vlad

> > Konstantin
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >> --
> > > >> 2.1.0
> >
>