All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: mrex@tranzeo.com
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ath10k tx99-like test mode?
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 14:21:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55074946.2040200@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <023401d0602b$0b3139a0$2193ace0$@tranzeo.com>

On 03/16/2015 01:51 PM, mrex@tranzeo.com wrote:
> Ben,
> 
> The tx99 feature has the benefit of not needing any client or traffic to be
> passed for a power meter to measure.  So it’s incredibly fast to test
> different rates and output power than having to wait for client to
> re-associate, pass traffic and adjust power meter to duty cycle (depending
> on how fancy the meter is).  This is more applicable for calibration and
> evaluation than for adaption or protocol testing.
> 
> Tx99 is better suited for calibration and FCC certification testing and not
> for testing things like adaptive modulation or what happens when mixed
> modulations are enabled.  It cuts down on lab certification test time and
> complexity (lab engineers test a different wireless widget every day and not
> familiar with webGUI’s and config settings, etc).  Tx99 often was more ‘raw’
> and didn’t behave the same as adaptive modulation algorithm, probably more
> so with more streams than 1 and 11b/g/n.
> 
> So having a feature that can just output raw frames at full duty cycle at a
> specific rate and output power without client would be highly beneficial for
> lab testing and reduce test time and complexity for radio validation.

I tried to get ath10k firmware to send raw frames on a monitor interface,
but it seems it requires a peer of some sort before it will send frames,
and I had no real luck.

I'm imagine there is some way to make firmware able to do this, but I don't
know how to do that at this time.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-16 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-16 20:51 ath10k tx99-like test mode? mrex
2015-03-16 21:21 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-03-17 10:55   ` Simon Wunderlich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-16 12:21 Simon Wunderlich
2015-03-16 15:04 ` Ben Greear
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Pushpal Sidhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55074946.2040200@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mrex@tranzeo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.