From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
keescook@chromium.org, ast@plumgrid.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, wad@chromium.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove unused thread_struct::usersp
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:22:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55081C6D.6090609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150317073901.GC19645@pd.tnic>
On 03/17/2015 08:39 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 08:21:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Assuming this does not fix the regression, could you apply the minimal
>> patch below - which reverts the old_rsp handling change.
>>
>> (The rest of the commit are in a third patch, but those are only
>> comment changes.)
>>
>> So my theory is that this change is what will revert the regression.
>
> Yep, it does. Below is the diff that works (it is the rough revert
> without the comments :-)):
>
...
> @@ -395,6 +398,8 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
> /*
> * Switch the PDA and FPU contexts.
> */
> + prev->usersp = this_cpu_read(old_rsp);
> + this_cpu_write(old_rsp, next->usersp);
I have a theory. There is a time window when user's sp
is in PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp) but not yet in pt_regs->sp,
and *interrupts are enabled*:
ENTRY(system_call)
SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
movq %rsp,PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp)
movq PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack),%rsp
ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK 8 /* +8: space for orig_ax */
movq %rcx,RIP(%rsp)
movq PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp),%rcx
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
movq %r11,EFLAGS(%rsp)
movq %rcx,RSP(%rsp)
Before indicated insn, interrupts are already enabled.
If preempt would hit now, next task can clobber PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp).
Then, when we return to this task, a bogus user's sp will be stored
in pt_regs, restores on exit to userspace, and next attempt
to, say, execute RETQ will try to pop a bogus, likely noncanonical
address into RIP -> #GP -> SEGV!
The theory can be tested by just moving interrupt enable a bit down:
ENTRY(system_call)
SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
movq %rsp,PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp)
movq PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack),%rsp
- ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
ALLOC_PT_GPREGS_ON_STACK 8 /* +8: space for orig_ax */
movq %rcx,RIP(%rsp)
movq PER_CPU_VAR(old_rsp),%rcx
movq %r11,EFLAGS(%rsp)
movq %rcx,RSP(%rsp)
+ ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
If I'm right, segfaults should be gone.
Borislav, can you try this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-17 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-10 10:45 [PATCH 2/4] x86: entry_64.S: remove stub_iopl Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-10 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: entry_64.S: remove unused thread_struct::usersp Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-11 12:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-11 15:19 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-16 12:05 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove unused thread_struct:: usersp tip-bot for Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-16 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-16 22:20 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove unused thread_struct::usersp Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-17 7:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-17 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-17 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-17 7:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-17 12:22 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2015-03-17 12:51 ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-17 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-17 8:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-17 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-17 9:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-11 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: entry_64.S: remove stub_iopl Borislav Petkov
2015-03-16 12:05 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry/64: Remove stub_iopl tip-bot for Denys Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55081C6D.6090609@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.