From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1YXvV4-0001IP-0I for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:41:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37421) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXvV1-0001Di-S6 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:41:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXvUv-0005wG-75 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:41:51 -0400 Received: from web006.ispnoc.net ([178.21.20.23]:58994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXvUv-0005wC-1Y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:41:45 -0400 Received: from 236.193.187.81.in-addr.arpa ([81.187.193.236] helo=[192.168.1.68]) by web006.ispnoc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YXvUm-0000Fu-9d; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 18:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <55086756.5030801@gluglug.org.uk> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:41:42 +0000 From: The Gluglug User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrei Borzenkov , Lunar Subject: Re: [bug #44238] Add support for menu.c32 and vesamenu.c32 in lib/syslinux_parse References: <20150213-163409.sv98365.64186@savannah.gnu.org> <20150213-190108.sv89796.21318@savannah.gnu.org> <20150213202023.GF688@loar> <20150213234024.48b03da1@opensuse.site> <20150213210904.GH688@loar> <20150214091509.7a8cc5d0@opensuse.site> In-Reply-To: <20150214091509.7a8cc5d0@opensuse.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 178.21.20.23 Cc: The development of GNU GRUB X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:41:52 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, see my other message that I sent a few minutes ago. Those problems that I reported "elsewhere" no longer exist with the latest rebased patch. On 14/02/15 06:15, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > В Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:09:04 +0100 Lunar > пишет: > >> Andrei Borzenkov: >>> [… review and comments …] >> >> Ok, here's another try. >> > > It looks OK but as someone reported that your patches seem to > cause problems elsewhere let's wait for confirmation. > > @gluglug - could you test both update versions? Thank you. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVCGdWAAoJEP9Ft0z50c+UkwIH/3qtVZWG5I9CQCyT4DrAPdfI jYOEvQsMAyFmLlCQVd+3NUlS9txwd9M8eHQ0kYRRBkWVy6kNP2MQKjcQ/hCY/hEt sOMM5f23lKWtUzc8mY3k+eV4SHjnYzCbRLu7UrUu0QCK/kNSXxg/dFKB9ylfNrVW wuF7EUm62bz5N0R/sUDgcfrxecQBvK5D8bPdn8WQJfjeBlI7+vM+KOvx3xF82MXq Oiot0ueJZlUwsDINw4s+d2+Yi6fH3Uf8TwxgGr/UzBAB5n6Li40wlCXMAhw3UC+9 /hhf561zkOGKL+0y1Ttu0sk9TRTT+2jFvXmkNGRDRjkOdAt/9bjvXLt2JMIBEOE= =irs5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----