From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47767) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXwE7-0002Ob-RR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:28:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXwE2-0003Tj-Sr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:28:27 -0400 Received: from vps01.wiesinger.com ([46.36.37.179]:33826) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXwE2-0003TZ-MD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:28:22 -0400 Message-ID: <5508723B.1040902@wiesinger.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:28:11 +0100 From: Gerhard Wiesinger MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5503542F.2080005@wiesinger.com> <20150314000749.GB28559@tesla.redhat.com> <550725C2.7020605@redhat.com> <5507571B.4020007@wiesinger.com> <55083352.9000201@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <55083352.9000201@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Fedora Virt preview and qemu 2.2.1 update List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cole Robinson , Kashyap Chamarthy Cc: qemu-devel On 17.03.2015 14:59, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 03/16/2015 06:20 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote: >> On 16.03.2015 19:49, Cole Robinson wrote: >>> Since 2.3 rc0 should be out tomorrow, I'll just wait for that to be released >>> and build it for rawhide/f22 and virt-preview >>> >> Shouldn't we have a 2.2.1 version, too? >> >> A reference point between 2.1 and the not yet released version 2.3 version >> would be fine. >> > The repos don't really work like that. If I build 2.2.1, then soon after build > 2.3-rc0, the 2.2.1 packages will disappear from the repos. In the case of > rawhide you could still grab it from koji, but for virt-preview the 2.2.1 > package would be gone. So I don't see the usefulness in putting in effort to > package 2.2.1 when it will only be available for a very brief window of time. > Yes, but shouldn't be there a difference between rawhide (e.g. 2.3-rc0) and fedora virt preview library (e.g. currently 2.2.1)? Or is rawhide everything and fedora-virt-preview.repo only the virt part of rawhide? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Virtualization_Preview_Repository http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/fedora-virt-preview.repo Nevertheless I don't see any advantages releasing RC production quality to the rawhide repository as we expect the release soon. As my question regarding "support" for virt preview was not answered when I had problems and tried it I think I'll switch back to Fedora supported repos. Thank you anyway. Ciao, Gerhard