From: Deepak S <deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Deminish contribution of wait-boosting from clients
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:30:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55093EA2.6060108@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425654391-2126-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Friday 06 March 2015 08:36 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> With boosting for missed pageflips, we have a much stronger indication
> of when we need to (temporarily) boost GPU frequency to ensure smooth
> delivery of frames. So now only allow each client to perform one RPS boost
> in each period of GPU activity due to stalling on results.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 9 ++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 35 ++++++++-------------------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---
> 5 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index cc83cc0ff823..9366eaa50dba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -2245,6 +2245,44 @@ static int i915_ppgtt_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int i915_rps_boost_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> +{
> + struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
> + struct drm_device *dev = node->minor->dev;
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + struct drm_file *file;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> + if (ret)
> + goto unlock;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(file, &dev->filelist, lhead) {
> + struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
> + struct task_struct *task;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + task = pid_task(file->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> + seq_printf(m, "%s [%d]: %d boosts%s\n",
> + task ? task->comm : "<unknown>",
> + task ? task->pid : -1,
> + file_priv->rps_boosts,
> + list_empty(&file_priv->rps_boost) ? "" : ", active");
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> + seq_printf(m, "Kernel boosts: %d\n", dev_priv->rps.boosts);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> +unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int i915_llc(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> {
> struct drm_info_node *node = m->private;
> @@ -4680,6 +4718,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list i915_debugfs_list[] = {
> {"i915_ddb_info", i915_ddb_info, 0},
> {"i915_sseu_status", i915_sseu_status, 0},
> {"i915_drrs_status", i915_drrs_status, 0},
> + {"i915_rps_boost_info", i915_rps_boost_info, 0},
> };
> #define I915_DEBUGFS_ENTRIES ARRAY_SIZE(i915_debugfs_list)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index bfa6e11f802e..b207d2cec9dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1036,6 +1036,8 @@ struct intel_gen6_power_mgmt {
>
> bool enabled;
> struct delayed_work delayed_resume_work;
> + struct list_head clients;
> + unsigned boosts;
>
> /* manual wa residency calculations */
> struct intel_rps_ei up_ei, down_ei;
> @@ -2137,12 +2139,13 @@ struct drm_i915_file_private {
> struct {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct list_head request_list;
> - struct delayed_work idle_work;
> } mm;
> struct idr context_idr;
>
> - atomic_t rps_wait_boost;
> - struct intel_engine_cs *bsd_ring;
> + struct list_head rps_boost;
> + struct intel_engine_cs *bsd_ring;
> +
> + unsigned rps_boosts;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index b266b31690e4..a0c35f80836c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -1191,14 +1191,6 @@ static bool missed_irq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return test_bit(ring->id, &dev_priv->gpu_error.missed_irq_rings);
> }
>
> -static bool can_wait_boost(struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv)
> -{
> - if (file_priv == NULL)
> - return true;
> -
> - return !atomic_xchg(&file_priv->rps_wait_boost, true);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * __i915_wait_request - wait until execution of request has finished
> * @req: duh!
> @@ -1240,13 +1232,8 @@ int __i915_wait_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
> timeout_expire = timeout ?
> jiffies + nsecs_to_jiffies_timeout((u64)*timeout) : 0;
>
> - if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6 && ring->id == RCS && can_wait_boost(file_priv)) {
> - gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv);
> - if (file_priv)
> - mod_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
> - &file_priv->mm.idle_work,
> - msecs_to_jiffies(100));
> - }
> + if (ring->id == RCS && INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 6)
> + gen6_rps_boost(dev_priv, file_priv);
>
> if (!irq_test_in_progress && WARN_ON(!ring->irq_get(ring)))
> return -ENODEV;
> @@ -5070,8 +5057,6 @@ void i915_gem_release(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> {
> struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv = file->driver_priv;
>
> - cancel_delayed_work_sync(&file_priv->mm.idle_work);
> -
> /* Clean up our request list when the client is going away, so that
> * later retire_requests won't dereference our soon-to-be-gone
> * file_priv.
> @@ -5087,15 +5072,12 @@ void i915_gem_release(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> request->file_priv = NULL;
> }
> spin_unlock(&file_priv->mm.lock);
> -}
> -
> -static void
> -i915_gem_file_idle_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
> -{
> - struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv =
> - container_of(work, typeof(*file_priv), mm.idle_work.work);
>
> - atomic_set(&file_priv->rps_wait_boost, false);
> + if (!list_empty(&file_priv->rps_boost)) {
> + mutex_lock(&to_i915(dev)->rps.hw_lock);
> + list_del(&file_priv->rps_boost);
> + mutex_unlock(&to_i915(dev)->rps.hw_lock);
> + }
> }
>
> int i915_gem_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> @@ -5112,11 +5094,10 @@ int i915_gem_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file)
> file->driver_priv = file_priv;
> file_priv->dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> file_priv->file = file;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file_priv->rps_boost);
>
> spin_lock_init(&file_priv->mm.lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&file_priv->mm.request_list);
> - INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&file_priv->mm.idle_work,
> - i915_gem_file_idle_work_handler);
>
> ret = i915_gem_context_open(dev, file);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 87e09a58191a..299d0c68f0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -1241,7 +1241,8 @@ void gen6_update_ring_freq(struct drm_device *dev);
> void gen6_rps_busy(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void gen6_rps_reset_ei(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> void gen6_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> -void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> +void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv);
> void intel_queue_rps_boost_for_request(struct drm_device *dev,
> struct drm_i915_gem_request *rq);
> void ilk_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 120b8af3c60c..307edc035af1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3931,10 +3931,14 @@ void gen6_rps_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
> I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0xffffffff);
> }
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&dev_priv->rps.clients))
> + list_del_init(dev_priv->rps.clients.next);
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> }
>
> -void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv)
> {
> u32 val;
>
> @@ -3942,9 +3946,16 @@ void gen6_rps_boost(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> val = dev_priv->rps.max_freq_softlimit;
> if (dev_priv->rps.enabled &&
> dev_priv->mm.busy &&
> - dev_priv->rps.cur_freq < val) {
> + dev_priv->rps.cur_freq < val &&
> + (file_priv == NULL || list_empty(&file_priv->rps_boost))) {
> intel_set_rps(dev_priv->dev, val);
> dev_priv->rps.last_adj = 0;
> +
> + if (file_priv != NULL) {
> + list_add(&file_priv->rps_boost, &dev_priv->rps.clients);
> + file_priv->rps_boosts++;
> + } else
> + dev_priv->rps.boosts++;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> }
> @@ -6608,7 +6619,7 @@ static void __intel_rps_boost_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct request_boost *boost = container_of(work, struct request_boost, work);
>
> if (!i915_gem_request_completed(boost->rq, true))
> - gen6_rps_boost(to_i915(boost->rq->ring->dev));
> + gen6_rps_boost(to_i915(boost->rq->ring->dev), NULL);
>
> i915_gem_request_unreference(boost->rq);
> kfree(boost);
> @@ -6640,6 +6651,7 @@ void intel_pm_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dev_priv->rps.delayed_resume_work,
> intel_gen6_powersave_work);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev_priv->rps.clients);
>
> dev_priv->pm.suspended = false;
> }
Cool. Patch looks fine
Reviewed-by: Deepak S<deepak.s@linux.intel.com>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-18 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 15:06 [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Relax RPS contraints to allows setting minfreq on idle Chris Wilson
2015-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/i915: Fix computation of last_adjustment for RPS autotuning Chris Wilson
2015-03-06 17:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-06 21:44 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 6:56 ` Deepak S
2015-03-18 9:05 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 9:20 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 11:09 ` Deepak S
2015-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Improved w/a for rps on Baytrail Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 7:56 ` Deepak S
2015-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Use down ei for manual Baytrail RPS calculations Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 8:04 ` Deepak S
2015-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/i915: Agressive downclocking on Baytrail Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 8:12 ` Deepak S
2015-03-18 9:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-03-18 9:49 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 11:06 ` Deepak S
2015-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/i915: Boost GPU frequency if we detect outstanding pageflips Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 8:18 ` Deepak S
2015-03-18 8:20 ` Deepak S
2015-03-06 15:06 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/i915: Deminish contribution of wait-boosting from clients Chris Wilson
2015-03-06 17:58 ` shuang.he
2015-03-18 9:00 ` Deepak S [this message]
2015-03-09 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/i915: Relax RPS contraints to allows setting minfreq on idle Jesse Barnes
2015-03-18 5:44 ` Deepak S
2015-03-18 9:07 ` Chris Wilson
2015-03-18 5:52 ` Deepak S
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55093EA2.6060108@linux.intel.com \
--to=deepak.s@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.