From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"slaoub@gmail.com" <slaoub@gmail.com>,
"luto@amacapital.net" <luto@amacapital.net>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mce, severities: Add AMD severities function
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:41:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550ADFFD.2090708@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150319092953.GB10860@pd.tnic>
On 3/19/2015 4:29 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:01:32AM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> One other thought. Instead of the run-time test to see if this is an AMD processor on every call
>> to this function, would it be cleaner to:
>>
>> 1) Rename existing mce_severity() function to mce_severity_intel()
>> 2) Declare a function pointer named mce_severity.
>> 3) Assign that pointer to the _intel() or _amd() function in mce_init()
> Yes, of course. We do that (or at least pretty close) in other paths
> too.
>
>
Ok, I'll work on this and prepend the changes to the current version of
the patch.
Would you prefer the changes be in a separate patch or lump it in along
with current version?
Thanks,
-Aravind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-16 17:16 [PATCH] x86, mce, severities: Add AMD severities function Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-03-17 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-17 9:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-17 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-17 10:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-17 18:41 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-03-17 18:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-19 0:01 ` Luck, Tony
2015-03-19 9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-19 14:41 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan [this message]
2015-03-19 15:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-19 16:20 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-03-19 17:15 ` Luck, Tony
2015-03-20 15:59 ` Aravind Gopalakrishnan
2015-03-20 16:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-20 17:49 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550ADFFD.2090708@amd.com \
--to=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=slaoub@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.