diff for duplicates of <550AEF9D.6090307@wwwdotorg.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index f97388c..1089431 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ On 03/19/2015 04:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Yes, but only child nodes, not the complete bus. Here is an RFC of what > I mean: > -> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org> +> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> > Subject: [RFC] i2c: of: always check if busses are enabled > > Allow all busses to have a "status" property which allows busses to not @@ -48,7 +48,3 @@ Perhaps better would be to have a mux-specific function to iterate over a mux's child nodes and instantiate buses for those. That function would check whether each bus node was disabled or not. That'd isolate the special case into the place where it was relevant. --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in -the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index f1dc2f7..ac93314 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,19 +5,10 @@ "ref\020150318140037.GE3580@katana\0" "ref\0550A05E5.3050100@gmail.com\0" "ref\020150319100944.GA914@katana\0" - "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes\0" + "From\0swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes\0" "Date\0Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:47:41 -0600\0" - "To\0Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>" - " Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>" - Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> - Gregory Clement <gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> - Gabriel Dobato <dobatog-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org - " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 03/19/2015 04:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:\n" @@ -41,7 +32,7 @@ "> Yes, but only child nodes, not the complete bus. Here is an RFC of what\n" "> I mean:\n" ">\n" - "> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>\n" "> Subject: [RFC] i2c: of: always check if busses are enabled\n" ">\n" "> Allow all busses to have a \"status\" property which allows busses to not\n" @@ -69,10 +60,6 @@ "Perhaps better would be to have a mux-specific function to iterate over \n" "a mux's child nodes and instantiate buses for those. That function would \n" "check whether each bus node was disabled or not. That'd isolate the \n" - "special case into the place where it was relevant.\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe devicetree\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + special case into the place where it was relevant. -c713c3ed21ed0dc377c6be216ce119f1282eea47e11987bc1ce47c1ec0e43192 +0d844fb77ffd6cc815915bab169c86dc43f37c32cdd033b3a9e24eb764dcb88d
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index f97388c..1089431 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ On 03/19/2015 04:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Yes, but only child nodes, not the complete bus. Here is an RFC of what > I mean: > -> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org> +> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> > Subject: [RFC] i2c: of: always check if busses are enabled > > Allow all busses to have a "status" property which allows busses to not @@ -48,7 +48,3 @@ Perhaps better would be to have a mux-specific function to iterate over a mux's child nodes and instantiate buses for those. That function would check whether each bus node was disabled or not. That'd isolate the special case into the place where it was relevant. --- -To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in -the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org -More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index f1dc2f7..f31c604 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -5,19 +5,19 @@ "ref\020150318140037.GE3580@katana\0" "ref\0550A05E5.3050100@gmail.com\0" "ref\020150319100944.GA914@katana\0" - "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>\0" + "From\0Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes\0" "Date\0Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:47:41 -0600\0" - "To\0Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>" - " Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>\0" - "Cc\0Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>" - Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org> - Gregory Clement <gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> - Gabriel Dobato <dobatog-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> - linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org - linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org - " linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\0" + "To\0Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>" + " Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>\0" + "Cc\0Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>" + Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> + Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com> + Gabriel Dobato <dobatog@gmail.com> + linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org + devicetree@vger.kernel.org + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On 03/19/2015 04:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:\n" @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ "> Yes, but only child nodes, not the complete bus. Here is an RFC of what\n" "> I mean:\n" ">\n" - "> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>\n" + "> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>\n" "> Subject: [RFC] i2c: of: always check if busses are enabled\n" ">\n" "> Allow all busses to have a \"status\" property which allows busses to not\n" @@ -69,10 +69,6 @@ "Perhaps better would be to have a mux-specific function to iterate over \n" "a mux's child nodes and instantiate buses for those. That function would \n" "check whether each bus node was disabled or not. That'd isolate the \n" - "special case into the place where it was relevant.\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe devicetree\" in\n" - "the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org\n" - More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html + special case into the place where it was relevant. -c713c3ed21ed0dc377c6be216ce119f1282eea47e11987bc1ce47c1ec0e43192 +18b6e27334d9de28e723012d879fa936f6bb42694e48784a5c42e3d33c558dec
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.