Re: [PATCH 3/3] sparc: perf: Make counting mode actually work

[David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>]

On 3/19/15 12:29 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:15:17 -0600
>
>> I realize M7 patches are on hold by you. This one (and the first one
>> in this set) has nothing to do with the M7. perf counting mode has
>> been broken for years on sparc; this patch fixes it.
>
> Not on hold, I'm simply waiting for them to be resubmitted.
>
> Anything not marked "under review" in patchwork needs to be explicitly
> resubmitting anew if you want me to consider it.
>
> Sorry if that wasn't clear.
>

Help me understand your process for patches ... I sent the patches to 
you and the mailing list. You responded only to the M7 patch (2 of 3). 
Should I take that to mean the entire set is invalidated? ie., how do I 
know if a patch is marked 'under review'?

If patches are not directly related to one another you want them as 
individual patches -- versus what I did here which is 3 individual 
patches that touch sparc/perf code.

Most of my patches have gone through acme and he gladly takes individual 
patches from a set.