All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jane@us.ibm.com" <jane@us.ibm.com>,
	"marcel.dufour@ca.ibm.com" <marcel.dufour@ca.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: fs corruption recovery
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 16:52:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550B4501.8080200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D9B0893-DA8D-41D1-8782-BC966B91D44D@dilger.ca>

On 3/18/15 7:59 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I think that running a 17TB filesystem on ext3 is a recipe for disaster.  They should use ext4 for anything larger than 16TB.

Not only that - impossible, unless you have > 4k page sizes and > 4k blocks.

# mkfs.ext3: Size of device fsfile too big to be expressed in 32 bits
	using a blocksize of 4096.

Are they doing something clever on PPC w/ 64k blocks?

-Eric

> Upgrading e2fsprogs to the latest 1.42.12 is also strongly advised.   
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 
>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 18:56, Allison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've had some internal folks contact me for help with some
>> customers that are having file system corruption woes. It's been so
>> long since I've done any work on ext3/4 code it's hard for me to
>> advise. So I told them I would run the situation by the folks on
>> these mailing lists to see if I can generate some more ideas for
>> them.
>> 
>> They have a 17 TB ext3 file system on rhel 6.5. Upon reboot, the
>> system was not able to come up and reported errors with the super
>> block.  Right now, getting the machine to boot is not a critical as
>> just recovering customer data. They are able to boot a rescue disk
>> to run fsck and they report that it ran for a short while and
>> showed a lot of inode errors, but eventually it seg faulted. They
>> can re-run the tool, and they were able to progress further on
>> repeated runs, but they do not seem to be able to get further than
>> about 75%. They do not have the fsck core at this point in time,
>> but I'm guessing the tool is likely running out of memory for a
>> file system that large, and they say they are using an old fsck
>> (from 2010). They report having run fsck successfully on large file
>> systems in the past, but normally the machine has 24GB, and this
>> one has only 16GB due to a bad dim. The plan at the moment is for
>> them to fix the bad dim and try the latest fsck.
>> 
>> So the questions they had that I am hoping to get help for is are
>> there any other options they can try for data recovery? I am hoping
>> that the extra memory and the updated fsck might be able to
>> complete, but I'm not sure what has changed in the tool since then.
>> I can assist them to collect more information/cores. Any help is
>> appreciated! Thx!
>> 
>> Allison Henderson
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-19 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-19  0:56 fs corruption recovery Allison Henderson
2015-03-19  0:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2015-03-19 21:52   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-03-20  1:47   ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-20  5:47     ` Allison Henderson
2015-03-20 18:45       ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550B4501.8080200@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jane@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcel.dufour@ca.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.