From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: don't make DP a consumer of DISP1 on Exynos5250 Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:11:51 +0100 Message-ID: <55103B47.4070604@collabora.co.uk> References: <1426320716-28137-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <5506C945.5030603@suse.de> <5506E5D4.1020300@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk ([93.93.135.160]:33684 "EHLO bhuna.collabora.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752460AbbCWQL5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:11:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5506E5D4.1020300@collabora.co.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Andrzej Hajda , Kukjin Kim Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marek Szyprowski Hello, On 03/16/2015 03:16 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Andrzej, > > I looked at the Exynos5250 manual and I didn't find anything obvious > that is missing in the DISP1 pd dev node but the asynchronous bridges > clocks needed on Exynos5420 was also not well documented so I don't > know if I'm missing something. > > Do you know what could be missing here? Otherwise I think your patch > to add the DISP1 pd in the DT should be reverted to have display > working again on Exynos5250 boards. > I wasn't able to find what's missing in the DISP1 pd definition so posted a revert [0] to "ARM: dts: add display power domain for exynos5250". Kukjin, Please ignore $subject and pick [0] instead. This will avoid Snow and Spring display to stop working and later the PD can be added again once we know what was missing there. Best regards, Javier [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/23/224 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:11:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: don't make DP a consumer of DISP1 on Exynos5250 In-Reply-To: <5506E5D4.1020300@collabora.co.uk> References: <1426320716-28137-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <5506C945.5030603@suse.de> <5506E5D4.1020300@collabora.co.uk> Message-ID: <55103B47.4070604@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On 03/16/2015 03:16 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > Andrzej, > > I looked at the Exynos5250 manual and I didn't find anything obvious > that is missing in the DISP1 pd dev node but the asynchronous bridges > clocks needed on Exynos5420 was also not well documented so I don't > know if I'm missing something. > > Do you know what could be missing here? Otherwise I think your patch > to add the DISP1 pd in the DT should be reverted to have display > working again on Exynos5250 boards. > I wasn't able to find what's missing in the DISP1 pd definition so posted a revert [0] to "ARM: dts: add display power domain for exynos5250". Kukjin, Please ignore $subject and pick [0] instead. This will avoid Snow and Spring display to stop working and later the PD can be added again once we know what was missing there. Best regards, Javier [0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/23/224