All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/8] arm64: Get rid of struct cpu_table
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:41:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55105056.4020305@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150323173821.GD1556@arm.com>

On 23/03/15 17:38, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:11:02PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> On 18/03/15 14:55, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> @@ -209,22 +207,12 @@ static void __init smp_build_mpidr_hash(void)
>>>
>>>    static void __init setup_processor(void)
>>>    {
>>> -       struct cpu_info *cpu_info;
>>>           u64 features, block;
>>>           u32 cwg;
>>>           int cls;
>>>
>>> -       cpu_info = lookup_processor_type(read_cpuid_id());
>>> -       if (!cpu_info) {
>>> -               printk("CPU configuration botched (ID %08x), unable to continue.\n",
>>> -                      read_cpuid_id());
>>> -               while (1);
>>> -       }
>>> -
>>> -       cpu_name = cpu_info->cpu_name;
>>> -
>>> -       printk("CPU: %s [%08x] revision %d\n",
>>> -              cpu_name, read_cpuid_id(), read_cpuid_id() & 15);
>>> +       printk("CPU: AArch64 Processor [%08x] revision %d\n",
>>> +              read_cpuid_id(), read_cpuid_id() & 15);
>>>
>>
>> While we are at it, does it make sense to change
>>
>>    s/CPU/Boot CPU/
>>
>> to make it clear on a big.Little system ?
>
> This is already queued, so I don't think it's worth the effort now.
ok, not a major one. I will fix it in one of my series

Suzuki

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-23 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18 14:55 [PATCH v5 0/8] arm64: head.S cleanup Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] arm64: Get rid of struct cpu_table Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 16:11   ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-23 17:11   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-03-23 17:38     ` Will Deacon
2015-03-23 17:41       ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] arm64: add macros for common adrp usages Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 17:54   ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 17:56     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:05       ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:06         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] arm64: remove processor_id Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] arm64: remove __switch_data object from head.S Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] arm64: use PC-relative reference for secondary_holding_pen_release Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] arm64: merge __enable_mmu and __turn_mmu_on Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] arm64: remove __calc_phys_offset Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 14:55 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] arm64: enforce x1|x2|x3 == 0 upon kernel entry as per boot protocol Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:13   ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:16     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:46       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 18:57         ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 19:55           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 20:24             ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19  7:30               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 10:35                 ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19 10:38                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 10:41                     ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-19 11:00                       ` [PATCH v3] " Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-19 13:36                         ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-20 11:31                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 11:41                             ` Mark Rutland
2015-03-20 11:45                               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-20 12:25                                 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-20 12:50                                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-18 22:26           ` [PATCH v5 8/8] " Peter Maydell
2015-03-18 18:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] arm64: head.S cleanup Mark Rutland
2015-03-18 18:28   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55105056.4020305@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.