From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: marcel.a@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3] powerpc: fix -machine usb=no for newworld and pseries machines
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5510736B.8000107@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551059A0.9060602@suse.de>
On 23/03/2015 19:21, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 07:20 PM, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
>> On 03/23/2015 07:05 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Capture the explicit setting of "usb=no" into a separate bool, and
>>> use it to skip the update of machine->usb in the board init function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> hw/core/machine.c | 1 +
>>> hw/ppc/mac_newworld.c | 2 +-
>>> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 2 +-
>>> include/hw/boards.h | 1 +
>>> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
>>> index cb1185a..25c45e6 100644
>>> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
>>> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
>>> @@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static void machine_set_usb(Object *obj, bool
>>> value, Error **errp)
>>> MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj);
>>>
>>> ms->usb = value;
>>> + ms->usb_disabled = !value;
>> Maybe is too late now, but I really not like this pollution of
>> MachineState
>> with 'usb_disabled'. (Imagine we have this kind of fields for lots of
>> objects and lots
>> of corner cases...)
>> I know it comes to solve a bug, but we talked about it in another mail
>> thread and
>> this change in semantics was approved.
>>
>> Let me explain *why* I don't like it.
>> 1. We add an "usb_disabled" field to a base class (actually object)
>> of all the machines and the only place it is interesting is
>> for 2 machines on ppc.
So we do for kernel_irqchip_requested/allowed. Both approaches could be
replaced by a tri-state on/off/auto.
>> 2. Even for these 2 machines, the scenario of defaults=on and usb=off
>> is not practical.
Why? For example you could add a virtio-input device instead of a USB
keyboard and mouse.
> I'm personally fine either way, but I assumed that Paolo had a good
> reason for writing the patch?
Actually, two.
One good reason is that no matter how you look at it, it's at least
surprising and at worst a bug that "-machine usb=no" includes a default
USB controller.
The second good reason is that it's a guest ABI change for the versioned
pSeries machines, and as such it breaks migration.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 17:05 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.3] powerpc: fix -machine usb=no for newworld and pseries machines Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-23 17:28 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-23 18:20 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-23 18:21 ` Alexander Graf
2015-03-23 20:11 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2015-03-23 22:00 ` Marcel Apfelbaum
2015-03-24 7:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5510736B.8000107@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=marcel.a@redhat.com \
--cc=marcel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.