From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.dream-property.net (mail.dream-property.net [82.149.226.172]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B975573A99 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3063151B0B; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:30:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.dream-property.net Received: from mail.dream-property.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.dream-property.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07qTpRELBMiS; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:30:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.22.22.61] (55d45afc.access.ecotel.net [85.212.90.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.dream-property.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E5233151B0A; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:30:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5511BB3A.40302@opendreambox.org> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:30:02 +0100 From: Andreas Oberritter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?QW7DrWJhbCBMaW3Ds24=?= , openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org References: <1427126707-38854-1-git-send-email-anibal.limon@linux.intel.com> <55115179.7050506@opendreambox.org> <55119205.9040605@linux.intel.com> <55119FF4.6050800@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <55119FF4.6050800@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] package_manager/deb: apt-ftparchive needs a valid config X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:30:13 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 24.03.2015 18:33, Aníbal Limón wrote: > I reviewed the code and the issue is why PM's and Indexer's are > different classes i think they need to share common information. > For now your patch is the best solution, now i'm doing a little > improvements and i'll send v2 with your signature. Thank you, Aníbal! Btw., I think your development machine has a wrong timezone setting. Your patches appear to have a time offset of about seven hours. Regards, Andreas