From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: lv.zheng@intel.com, hpa@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
hdegoede@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org,
graeme.gregory@linaro.org, leo.duran@amd.com,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device matching
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:09:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5512CFB6.1020606@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1602323.I0oL7Cv9OO@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 3/24/15 15:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:43:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>> On 3/9/15 10:20, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>>>> [....]
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>>> index e530533..9a42522 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>>> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ struct css_device_id {
>>>>> struct acpi_device_id {
>>>>> __u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
>>>>> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
>>>>> + __u32 cls;
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice if we could change ordering here but I understand that
>>>> it breaks quite many drivers. Perhaps we should consider creating
>>>> ACPI_DEVICE() macro and convert existing drivers to that at some point.
>>>
>>> Yes, a roughly grep in the drivers directory showing about 112 files at the
>>> moment. If you think this is the right approach going forward, we can work
>>> on cleaning this up on a separate patch series. Please let me know what you
>>> think.
>>
>> I think having ACPI_DEVICE() macro would be pretty useful and it avoids
>> things like this if we need to add new fields in the future. Rafael has
>> the last word, though :-)
>
> I agree.
Okay, how should I organize this big change? Can we do this as a
separate patch series?
Thanks,
Suravee
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <lv.zheng@intel.com>, <hpa@linux.intel.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<hdegoede@redhat.com>, <tj@kernel.org>, <arnd@arndb.de>,
<mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<hanjun.guo@linaro.org>, <al.stone@linaro.org>,
<graeme.gregory@linaro.org>, <leo.duran@amd.com>,
<linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [V5 PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device matching
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:09:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5512CFB6.1020606@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1602323.I0oL7Cv9OO@vostro.rjw.lan>
On 3/24/15 15:20, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 04:43:46 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>>> On 3/9/15 10:20, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>>>> [....]
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>>> index e530533..9a42522 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
>>>>> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ struct css_device_id {
>>>>> struct acpi_device_id {
>>>>> __u8 id[ACPI_ID_LEN];
>>>>> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
>>>>> + __u32 cls;
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice if we could change ordering here but I understand that
>>>> it breaks quite many drivers. Perhaps we should consider creating
>>>> ACPI_DEVICE() macro and convert existing drivers to that at some point.
>>>
>>> Yes, a roughly grep in the drivers directory showing about 112 files at the
>>> moment. If you think this is the right approach going forward, we can work
>>> on cleaning this up on a separate patch series. Please let me know what you
>>> think.
>>
>> I think having ACPI_DEVICE() macro would be pretty useful and it avoids
>> things like this if we need to add new fields in the future. Rafael has
>> the last word, though :-)
>
> I agree.
Okay, how should I organize this big change? Can we do this as a
separate patch series?
Thanks,
Suravee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 6:11 [V5 PATCH 0/2] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-06 6:11 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-06 6:11 ` [V5 PATCH 1/2] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device matching Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-06 6:11 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-09 15:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-24 14:23 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-24 14:23 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-24 14:43 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-24 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-03-25 15:09 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2015-03-25 15:09 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-25 15:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-25 15:11 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-25 15:11 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-06 6:11 ` [V5 PATCH 2/2] ata: ahci_platform: Add ACPI _CLS matching Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-06 6:11 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5512CFB6.1020606@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.