From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] printk adjustments
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 17:26:12 +0000
Message-ID: <5512EFB4.5050005@citrix.com>
References: <550C44F1020000780006C1A5@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <550C44F1020000780006C1A5@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 20/03/15 16:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 1: introduce gprintk()
> 2: make {,g}dprintk() a no-op in non-debug builds
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@suse.com>

Both Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

It is likely that some other shifting of messages will happen, but lets 
see what this looks like as a first pass.

~Andrew