All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: I think "btrfs: fix leak of path in btrfs_find_item" broke stable trees ...
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:24:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55137BE2.80603@redhat.com> (raw)

Looks like "btrfs: fix leak of path in btrfs_find_item" got sent
to stable trees, but in my testing, it causes deadlocks on mount:

[23379.359246] mount           D 0000000000000000     0 22541  22274 0x00000080
[23379.366326]  ffff8803ebadf6c8 0000000000000086 ffff88027ff10230 0000000000013680
[23379.373770]  0000000000013680 ffff8803ebadffd8 ffff8803ebadc010 0000000000013680
[23379.381208]  ffff8803ebadffd8 0000000000013680 ffff880261c78b60 ffff8802140a0b60
[23379.388648] Call Trace:
[23379.391106]  [<ffffffff816182b9>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[23379.396091]  [<ffffffffa06b82f5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xb5/0x290 [btrfs]
[23379.402444]  [<ffffffff8109b470>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
[23379.407855]  [<ffffffffa064f7a5>] ? generic_bin_search+0xf5/0x180 [btrfs]
[23379.414643]  [<ffffffffa065041b>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x3b/0x50 [btrfs]
[23379.421345]  [<ffffffffa065936b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x63b/0x800 [btrfs]
[23379.427956]  [<ffffffffa064fa49>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x39/0x80 [btrfs]
[23379.435088]  [<ffffffffa0659ede>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x7e/0xe0 [btrfs]
[23379.442125]  [<ffffffffa065051a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
[23379.448655]  [<ffffffffa06b8989>] btrfs_insert_orphan_item+0x69/0x90 [btrfs]
[23379.455696]  [<ffffffffa06ba938>] insert_orphan_item+0x68/0x90 [btrfs]
[23379.462251]  [<ffffffffa06bf772>] replay_one_buffer+0x372/0x380 [btrfs]
[23379.468878]  [<ffffffffa069a4c1>] ? mark_extent_buffer_accessed+0x51/0x70 [btrfs]
[23379.476372]  [<ffffffffa06ba54b>] walk_up_log_tree+0x1cb/0x250 [btrfs]
[23379.482910]  [<ffffffffa06ba68f>] walk_log_tree+0xbf/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[23379.489098]  [<ffffffffa06bd51c>] btrfs_recover_log_trees+0x1ec/0x4c0 [btrfs]
...

I could hit this by running ./check generic/015  generic/039 in fstests,
with a SCRATCH_DEV_POOL defined (not sure it matters, it's just what I
have...)

This fixes it, though I'm not totally sure why.  Refcounts?

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
index 906934e..d37e6d1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
@@ -1265,11 +1265,11 @@ static int insert_orphan_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	ret = btrfs_find_item(root, path, BTRFS_ORPHAN_OBJECTID,
 			offset, BTRFS_ORPHAN_ITEM_KEY, NULL);
+	btrfs_free_path(path);
+
 	if (ret > 0)
 		ret = btrfs_insert_orphan_item(trans, root, offset);
 
-	btrfs_free_path(path);
-
 	return ret;
 }
 

but it never likely showed up upstream, because 

9c4f61f btrfs: simplify insert_orphan_item

made the whole path alloc/free go away.

-Eric

             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-26  3:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-26  3:24 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2015-03-26 10:23 ` I think "btrfs: fix leak of path in btrfs_find_item" broke stable trees Filipe David Manana
2015-03-26 14:11   ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-26 14:48     ` Chris Mason
2015-03-26 17:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-26 17:25         ` Filipe David Manana
2015-03-26 20:38           ` Eric Sandeen
2015-03-27  3:34         ` Eryu Guan
2015-03-27 21:49           ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55137BE2.80603@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.