From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EBA57E00779; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:44:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail.chez-thomas.org (mail.mlbassoc.com [65.100.170.105]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D5CE0056E for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 1998) id 3CAD3F811DD; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:44:42 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [192.168.1.114] (zeus [192.168.1.114]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFD1F811D7; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:44:41 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <55140D4C.2060107@mlbassoc.com> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:44:44 -0600 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yocto Project Subject: Sharing sstate X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:44:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have two development servers, one running an older version of Fedora (x86 *), the other runs a recent Ubuntu (x86_64). Both are the same CPU core (Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz) I've just tried building the same target, using the same version of Poky/Yocto, sharing the sstate cache (fully populated) from the x86_64 machine with the x86 machine. This was done using HTTP. Sadly, there was not a single file found in the cache that could be used. Should this not be expected to work? Does sstate cache only work across like systems (32 vs 64 bit hosts)? Also, Mark Hatle mentioned a few days ago that there are ways to "lock" versions of the sstate cache. I still haven't found any info/documentation on this. Can someone please explain more? Thanks (*) I can't update my x86 machine to a more recent (x86_64) distribution as I have many older "projects" that only run on that hardware and no time/opportunity to upgrade, hence my desire to share in this manner. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------