diff for duplicates of <55142405.3090000@Netapp.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 937a840..6e74e87 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -79,4 +79,9 @@ On 03/24/2015 01:49 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
 > wrote to it it's a cached read, if you did unmount the filesystem after
 > writing, or did an echo to /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches you get uncached
 > read behavior.
->
+> 
+
+_______________________________________________
+xfs mailing list
+xfs@oss.sgi.com
+http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index f5c6ef5..0858c42 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@
  "Date\0Thu, 26 Mar 2015 11:21:41 -0400\0"
  "To\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>\0"
  "Cc\0J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>"
-  Marc Eshel <eshel@us.ibm.com>
   linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
-  <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
- " <xfs@oss.sgi.com>\0"
+  Marc Eshel <eshel@us.ibm.com>
+  linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
+ " xfs@oss.sgi.com\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Here are my updated numbers!  I tested with files 5G in size: one 100% data, one 100% hole, and one alternating between hole and data every 4K.  I collected data for both v4.1 and v4.2 with and without the READ_PLUS patches:\n"
@@ -101,6 +101,11 @@
  "> wrote to it it's a cached read, if you did unmount the filesystem after\n"
  "> writing, or did an echo to /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches you get uncached\n"
  "> read behavior.\n"
- >
+ "> \n"
+ "\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "xfs mailing list\n"
+ "xfs@oss.sgi.com\n"
+ http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
 
-3efc2b9321716e1417b9cc90ee196db7b519a195e90868980bc870f8ab888f9f
+94799feaad4817273ffa2f9b8c4f1b0a5dd4e569b4e90d752a4d6c7d332fc411
