From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Giant backport tasks Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 11:46:40 +0100 Message-ID: <55168690.2060603@dachary.org> References: <87zj6x3c49.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xvMiUpSI84iAFpTkPUIbnum62PwdA9Cnk" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:38113 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752054AbbC1Kqy (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Mar 2015 06:46:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zj6x3c49.fsf@gmail.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Abhishek L Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xvMiUpSI84iAFpTkPUIbnum62PwdA9Cnk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [cc'ing ceph-devel for archive] On 28/03/2015 06:49, Abhishek L wrote: > Hi Loic, >=20 > I've started looking into the pending runs for giant. The rados suites > came out green,=20 \o/ > rgw seems to have hit a bug, updated this in the > tracker,=20 Reading http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#rgw I suggest you use the me= thod described at http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOW= TO_describe_a_test_result $ python ../fail.py loic-2015-03-27_08:40:06-rgw-giant---basic-multi ** *'mkdir -p -- /home/ubuntu/cephtest/mnt.0/client.0/tmp && cd -- /home/= ubuntu/cephtest/mnt.0/client.0/tmp && CEPH_CLI_TEST_DUP_COMMAND=3D1 CEPH_= REF=3D90b37d9bdcc044e26f978632cd68f19ece82d19a TESTDIR=3D"/home/ubuntu/ce= phtest" CEPH_ID=3D"0" PATH=3D$PATH:/usr/sbin adjust-ulimits ceph-coverage= /home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/coverage timeout 3h /home/ubuntu/cephtest/= workunit.client.0/rgw/s3_bucket_quota.pl'* *** "rgw/multifs/{clusters/fixed-2.yaml frontend/civetweb.yaml fs/xfs.yam= l rgw_pool_type/replicated.yaml tasks/rgw_bucket_quota.yaml}":http://pulp= ito.ceph.com/loic-2015-03-27_08:40:06-rgw-giant---basic-multi/824286 When you have a single bug it's marginally useful but it helps a lot when= you have more than a dozen. > some time on why the radosgw hit a bug a little more > so that I can get to the cause of this.=20 Great, looking forward to read about it at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues= /11259 ;-) Cheers --=20 Lo=EFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --xvMiUpSI84iAFpTkPUIbnum62PwdA9Cnk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlUWhpAACgkQ8dLMyEl6F210XACeJZdYFw4Li1N0PgscGBra0jym kMcAniyCGUPtzSrLEa3PlKaLcixhluKE =L4Om -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xvMiUpSI84iAFpTkPUIbnum62PwdA9Cnk--