From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Status update for the last Giant release 0.87.2 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 12:10:16 +0100 Message-ID: <55168C18.9060307@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aXno4A6gOD2Ev9Cl0VEoQeJrLXiuTAA8M" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:38123 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751280AbbC1LKV (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Mar 2015 07:10:21 -0400 Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Abhishek L Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --aXno4A6gOD2Ev9Cl0VEoQeJrLXiuTAA8M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Abhishek, Looking at the last two issues marked as needing backport to giant: http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=3D68 (this link is at the top of http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-release= s/wiki/HOWTO) I'm not sure what to do about http://tracker.ceph.com/issue= s/10643. The problem is that it consistently shows up when testing upgrad= es that involve giant. We want to be sure Giant can be upgraded to Hammer= , therefore we need to keep testing the upgrades at least for a month or = two after Hammer is released to catch border cases. I think issue 10643 n= eeds to be fixed and included in 0.87.2 so that we can have clean upgrade= tests, otherwise it will mean more work for people watching over the upg= rade suites (I mean Yuri here ;-). And wif 10643 is included we can squee= ze http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10153 in as well, I think. Once this is dealt with and you're done with http://tracker.ceph.com/issu= es/11259 that you found when running the rgw suite at http://tracker.ceph= =2Ecom/issues/11153#rgw, 0.87.2 should be good, from our point of view (t= he point of view of backporters) and we can move to the "asking approval"= step of the workflow ( http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#Workflow ). = What do you think ? --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --aXno4A6gOD2Ev9Cl0VEoQeJrLXiuTAA8M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlUWjBgACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22sVQCgwXSUobMzrRbHL5WWbcVj9nkJ Ze0AoKZ6UFx1TovagOD687Nfm3k7gP6s =YRm3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --aXno4A6gOD2Ev9Cl0VEoQeJrLXiuTAA8M--