From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] sunxi: sun4i: improve cpu clock selection method
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:39:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5517F29C.2070005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55168198.5030207@gmail.com>
Hi,
On 28-03-15 11:25, Iain Paton wrote:
> clock_set_pll1 would pick the next highest available cpu clock speed if
> a value not in the pre defined table was selected. this potentially
> results in overclocking the soc.
>
> reverse the selection method so that we select the next lowest speed
> and add the missing 912Mhz setting that's requested by sun7i which also
> uses the sun4i clock code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iain Paton <ipaton0@gmail.com>
Thanks for the new set.
I've found one small issue with the second patch:
"sunxi: use CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ to set cpu clock"
sun7i.h contained the following:
#define CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ 24000000
#define CONFIG_TIMER_CLK_FREQ CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ
Which is a conflicting usage of CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ compared to the new
usage introduced by your patch. I've fixed this by changing the above
to:
#define CONFIG_TIMER_CLK_FREQ 24000000
And run some compile and runtime tests.
Everything builds and works fine with this change added, so I've pushed
these 3 commits + one other fix to: u-boot-sunxi/master
And I will send out a pull-req shortly to get these fixes included into
the upcoming u-boot v2015.04 release.
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c
> index 49f4032..c3e04af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/sunxi/clock_sun4i.c
> @@ -100,22 +100,23 @@ static struct {
> unsigned int freq;
> } pll1_para[] = {
> /* This array must be ordered by frequency. */
> - { PLL1_CFG(16, 0, 0, 0), 384000000 },
> - { PLL1_CFG(16, 1, 0, 0), 768000000 },
> - { PLL1_CFG(20, 1, 0, 0), 960000000 },
> - { PLL1_CFG(21, 1, 0, 0), 1008000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(22, 1, 0, 0), 1056000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(23, 1, 0, 0), 1104000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(24, 1, 0, 0), 1152000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(25, 1, 0, 0), 1200000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(26, 1, 0, 0), 1248000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(27, 1, 0, 0), 1296000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(28, 1, 0, 0), 1344000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(29, 1, 0, 0), 1392000000},
> - { PLL1_CFG(30, 1, 0, 0), 1440000000},
> { PLL1_CFG(31, 1, 0, 0), 1488000000},
> - /* Final catchall entry */
> - { PLL1_CFG(31, 1, 0, 0), ~0},
> + { PLL1_CFG(30, 1, 0, 0), 1440000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(29, 1, 0, 0), 1392000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(28, 1, 0, 0), 1344000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(27, 1, 0, 0), 1296000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(26, 1, 0, 0), 1248000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(25, 1, 0, 0), 1200000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(24, 1, 0, 0), 1152000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(23, 1, 0, 0), 1104000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(22, 1, 0, 0), 1056000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(21, 1, 0, 0), 1008000000},
> + { PLL1_CFG(20, 1, 0, 0), 960000000 },
> + { PLL1_CFG(19, 1, 0, 0), 912000000 },
> + { PLL1_CFG(16, 1, 0, 0), 768000000 },
> + /* Final catchall entry 384MHz*/
> + { PLL1_CFG(16, 0, 0, 0), 0 },
> +
> };
>
> void clock_set_pll1(unsigned int hz)
> @@ -126,10 +127,12 @@ void clock_set_pll1(unsigned int hz)
> (struct sunxi_ccm_reg *)SUNXI_CCM_BASE;
>
> /* Find target frequency */
> - while (pll1_para[i].freq < hz)
> + while (pll1_para[i].freq > hz)
> i++;
>
> hz = pll1_para[i].freq;
> + if (! hz)
> + hz = 384000000;
>
> /* Calculate system clock divisors */
> axi = DIV_ROUND_UP(hz, 432000000); /* Max 450MHz */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-29 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-28 10:25 [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/3] sunxi: sun4i: improve cpu clock selection method Iain Paton
2015-03-29 12:39 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2015-03-30 7:52 ` Iain Paton
2015-03-30 8:49 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5517F29C.2070005@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.