* Fedora 21 packages
@ 2015-03-28 13:22 Mustafa Muhammad
2015-03-28 17:36 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mustafa Muhammad @ 2015-03-28 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ceph-devel
Hi,
I am trying to install ceph on Fedora 21, but I can't find the
packages, is there any?
If not, can you please provide packages? I think they are more
important than Fedora 20 packages since F21 has more support time
remaining.
Regards
Mustafa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-28 13:22 Fedora 21 packages Mustafa Muhammad
@ 2015-03-28 17:36 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-29 21:55 ` Brad Hubbard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2015-03-28 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mustafa Muhammad; +Cc: ceph-devel
On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to install ceph on Fedora 21, but I can't find the
> packages, is there any?
> If not, can you please provide packages? I think they are more
> important than Fedora 20 packages since F21 has more support time
> remaining.
We don't have f21 packages yet; knee deep in other release issues.
We are always looking for people interested in maintaining the upstream CI
and build/release environment, though; it's a surprising amount of work
keeping it all running! There are other distros and architectures we're
missing too (e.g. we have armv7l hardware but no time to resurrect the
builds) for lack to time.
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-28 17:36 ` Sage Weil
@ 2015-03-29 21:55 ` Brad Hubbard
2015-03-29 23:45 ` Sage Weil
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brad Hubbard @ 2015-03-29 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil, Mustafa Muhammad; +Cc: ceph-devel
On 03/29/2015 03:36 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am trying to install ceph on Fedora 21, but I can't find the
>> packages, is there any?
>> If not, can you please provide packages? I think they are more
>> important than Fedora 20 packages since F21 has more support time
>> remaining.
>
> We don't have f21 packages yet; knee deep in other release issues.
>
> We are always looking for people interested in maintaining the upstream CI
> and build/release environment, though; it's a surprising amount of work
> keeping it all running! There are other distros and architectures we're
> missing too (e.g. we have armv7l hardware but no time to resurrect the
> builds) for lack to time.
>
> sage
They look like they are there to me. Am I missing something?
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
$ yum list ceph\* --showduplicates
Loaded plugins: langpacks
Installed Packages
ceph.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 @updates
ceph-common.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 @updates
ceph-libs-compat.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 @updates
Available Packages
ceph.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
ceph-common.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-common.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
ceph-deploy.noarch 1.5.10-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-deploy.noarch 1.5.21-1.fc21 updates
ceph-devel-compat.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-devel-compat.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
ceph-fuse.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-fuse.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
ceph-libs-compat.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-libs-compat.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
ceph-radosgw.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-radosgw.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
ceph-test.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
ceph-test.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
cephfs-java.x86_64 1:0.80.7-1.fc21 fedora
cephfs-java.x86_64 1:0.80.9-1.fc21 updates
$ repoquery --location ceph
http://mirror.as24220.net/pub/fedora/linux/updates/21/x86_64/c/ceph-0.80.9-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
Cheers,
Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-29 21:55 ` Brad Hubbard
@ 2015-03-29 23:45 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-30 0:30 ` Brad Hubbard
2015-03-30 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2015-03-29 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brad Hubbard; +Cc: Mustafa Muhammad, ceph-devel
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Brad Hubbard wrote:
> On 03/29/2015 03:36 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I am trying to install ceph on Fedora 21, but I can't find the
> > > packages, is there any?
> > > If not, can you please provide packages? I think they are more
> > > important than Fedora 20 packages since F21 has more support time
> > > remaining.
> >
> > We don't have f21 packages yet; knee deep in other release issues.
> >
> > We are always looking for people interested in maintaining the upstream CI
> > and build/release environment, though; it's a surprising amount of work
> > keeping it all running! There are other distros and architectures we're
> > missing too (e.g. we have armv7l hardware but no time to resurrect the
> > builds) for lack to time.
> >
> > sage
>
> They look like they are there to me. Am I missing something?
>
> $ cat /etc/redhat-release
> Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
>
> $ yum list ceph\* --showduplicates
> Loaded plugins: langpacks
> Installed Packages
> ceph.x86_64
> 1:0.80.9-1.fc21
> @updates
These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up
to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships
one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything
and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch
to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21.
sage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-29 23:45 ` Sage Weil
@ 2015-03-30 0:30 ` Brad Hubbard
2015-03-30 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Brad Hubbard @ 2015-03-30 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Mustafa Muhammad, ceph-devel
On 03/30/2015 09:45 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Brad Hubbard wrote:
>> On 03/29/2015 03:36 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2015, Mustafa Muhammad wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I am trying to install ceph on Fedora 21, but I can't find the
>>>> packages, is there any?
>>>> If not, can you please provide packages? I think they are more
>>>> important than Fedora 20 packages since F21 has more support time
>>>> remaining.
>>>
>>> We don't have f21 packages yet; knee deep in other release issues.
>>>
>>> We are always looking for people interested in maintaining the upstream CI
>>> and build/release environment, though; it's a surprising amount of work
>>> keeping it all running! There are other distros and architectures we're
>>> missing too (e.g. we have armv7l hardware but no time to resurrect the
>>> builds) for lack to time.
>>>
>>> sage
>>
>> They look like they are there to me. Am I missing something?
>>
>> $ cat /etc/redhat-release
>> Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
>>
>> $ yum list ceph\* --showduplicates
>> Loaded plugins: langpacks
>> Installed Packages
>> ceph.x86_64
>> 1:0.80.9-1.fc21
>> @updates
>
> These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up
> to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships
> one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything
> and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch
> to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21.
Ah, okay, now I see what I was missing (I figured I *was* missing something :) ).
Cheers,
Brad
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-29 23:45 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-30 0:30 ` Brad Hubbard
@ 2015-03-30 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-03-30 15:34 ` Sage Weil
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kratochvil @ 2015-03-30 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil; +Cc: Brad Hubbard, Mustafa Muhammad, ceph-devel
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:45:55 +0200, Sage Weil wrote:
> These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up
> to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships
> one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything
> and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch
> to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21.
That's not the Fedora way. LTS-like packages are not for Fedora, those are
for CentOS/RHEL (but where Ceph LTS is already present). Latest development
packages are for Fedora Rawhide. And for other cases there is also
https://fedorahosted.org/copr .
I have filed for Fedora-shipped ceph-deploy:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207275
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-30 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
@ 2015-03-30 15:34 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-30 15:54 ` Mark Nelson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sage Weil @ 2015-03-30 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: Brad Hubbard, Mustafa Muhammad, ceph-devel
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:45:55 +0200, Sage Weil wrote:
> > These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up
> > to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships
> > one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything
> > and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch
> > to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21.
>
> That's not the Fedora way. LTS-like packages are not for Fedora, those are
> for CentOS/RHEL (but where Ceph LTS is already present). Latest development
> packages are for Fedora Rawhide. And for other cases there is also
> https://fedorahosted.org/copr .
In that case, I think the latest stable release (e.g., giant) should go in
Fedora. Maybe we could put the latest development release in Rawhide, but
I'm nto sure. They're really not intended for end users.
sage
>
> I have filed for Fedora-shipped ceph-deploy:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207275
>
>
> Jan
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Fedora 21 packages
2015-03-30 15:34 ` Sage Weil
@ 2015-03-30 15:54 ` Mark Nelson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Nelson @ 2015-03-30 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sage Weil, Jan Kratochvil; +Cc: Brad Hubbard, Mustafa Muhammad, ceph-devel
On 03/30/2015 10:34 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:45:55 +0200, Sage Weil wrote:
>>> These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up
>>> to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships
>>> one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything
>>> and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch
>>> to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21.
>>
>> That's not the Fedora way. LTS-like packages are not for Fedora, those are
>> for CentOS/RHEL (but where Ceph LTS is already present). Latest development
>> packages are for Fedora Rawhide. And for other cases there is also
>> https://fedorahosted.org/copr .
>
> In that case, I think the latest stable release (e.g., giant) should go in
> Fedora. Maybe we could put the latest development release in Rawhide, but
> I'm nto sure. They're really not intended for end users.
>
> sage
>
FWIW, I've got some of our performance gear on fedora 20 right now and
happily use the gitbuilder packages (though there are some annoying
dependency issues that require different excludes during the yum
installation). It's incredibly convenient to be able to simply change
the repo and grab the newest build from different versions the same way
we do in Ubuntu. Hopefully regardless of whatever other decisions are
made, we can retain this kind of workflow with the gitbuilder releases.
Mark
>>
>> I have filed for Fedora-shipped ceph-deploy:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207275
>>
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-30 15:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-28 13:22 Fedora 21 packages Mustafa Muhammad
2015-03-28 17:36 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-29 21:55 ` Brad Hubbard
2015-03-29 23:45 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-30 0:30 ` Brad Hubbard
2015-03-30 15:17 ` Jan Kratochvil
2015-03-30 15:34 ` Sage Weil
2015-03-30 15:54 ` Mark Nelson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.