From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.nic.cz ([2001:1488:800:400::400]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YcVBB-0003Av-Qd for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:36:19 +0000 Message-ID: <55190AEB.8010704@nic.cz> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:35:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWFydGluIFN0cmJhxI1rYQ==?= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Weinberger Subject: Re: Missing support for ECC_SOFT_BCH in fsl-elbc-nand References: <55156575.8080704@nic.cz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Tomas Hlavacek , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 27.3.2015 17:02, Richard Weinberger wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Martin Strbačka wrote: >> Hello, >> >> in our product we have Freescale P2020 SoC together with Micron >> MT29F2G08ABAEAWP NAND. Lately we discovered that the internal driver >> (fsl-elbc-nand) supports only 1-bit HW ECC. So we would like to switch >> to ECC_SOFT_BCH (or on-die ECC as I saw some patches in this list >> recently). Do you know if anybody works on this or are there any patches >> already? > > Works on what? > I work (obviously) on on-die ECC support. I mean working on support ECC_SOFT_BCH or on-die ECC in fsl-elbc-nand. I believe that fsl-elbc-nand needs some modifications to support those ECC modes. Or am I wrong?