From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <5519149C.4030505@xenomai.org> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:17:16 +0200 From: Philippe Gerum MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Q: LTTNG & xenomai status List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Haberler , xenomai On 03/30/2015 10:58 AM, Michael Haberler wrote: > 2015-03-26 23:37 GMT+01:00 Michael Haberler : > >> what is the status on using LTTNG tracepoints in an RT thread? the last >> discussion has been a while back, like 2010ish >> >> LTTNG 2.5.1 is in the debian jessie stream. Can I use that as-is? >> >> Any special precautions I need to take, or do the stock instructions for >> LTTNG apply? >> > > noting that CONFIG_FTRACE was disabled for performance reasons: > http://www.xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2013-January/027272.html > > that would suggest *functionally* it is not an issue, and LTTng layers > ontop of CONFIG_FTRACE for kernel tracing > > or am I overlooking something? > Functionally it is not an issue, but the LTT core for any given LTT version might not be entirely safe for running over a kernel with pipelined interrupts. Fixing this is part of the usual process of merging LTTng and the I-pipe. -- Philippe.