From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Nelson Subject: Re: Fedora 21 packages Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 10:54:56 -0500 Message-ID: <551971D0.4070300@redhat.com> References: <551874D0.1090900@redhat.com> <20150330151731.GA17645@host1.jankratochvil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38171 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752783AbbC3PzA (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Mar 2015 11:55:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sage Weil , Jan Kratochvil Cc: Brad Hubbard , Mustafa Muhammad , ceph-devel On 03/30/2015 10:34 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:45:55 +0200, Sage Weil wrote: >>> These packages are from downstream Fedora. What's missing are more up >>> to date packages built and published at ceph.com. The distro only ships >>> one version of Ceph (the most recent LTS), while ceph.com gets everything >>> and ceph-deploy let's you choose which stable series or development branch >>> to install. We're also not doing any testing on f21. >> >> That's not the Fedora way. LTS-like packages are not for Fedora, those are >> for CentOS/RHEL (but where Ceph LTS is already present). Latest development >> packages are for Fedora Rawhide. And for other cases there is also >> https://fedorahosted.org/copr . > > In that case, I think the latest stable release (e.g., giant) should go in > Fedora. Maybe we could put the latest development release in Rawhide, but > I'm nto sure. They're really not intended for end users. > > sage > FWIW, I've got some of our performance gear on fedora 20 right now and happily use the gitbuilder packages (though there are some annoying dependency issues that require different excludes during the yum installation). It's incredibly convenient to be able to simply change the repo and grab the newest build from different versions the same way we do in Ubuntu. Hopefully regardless of whatever other decisions are made, we can retain this kind of workflow with the gitbuilder releases. Mark >> >> I have filed for Fedora-shipped ceph-deploy: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207275 >> >> >> Jan >> >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >