From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() API
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:41:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55197CA2.9040706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551977C1.4000303@ezchip.com>
On 03/30/2015 12:20 PM, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> I wanted to ping the patch below again, since I haven't heard any
> feedback.
>
> I note that Rik van Riel's change posted this weekend offers similar
> functionality for userspace. My change offers a convenient API
> for, e.g., kernel drivers setting up default irq balancing.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/28/94
I submitted a patch to irqbalance to exclude nohz_full
cpus from having irqs assigned to them. I could see
the same thing being useful for in-kernel irq assignment,
especially for multi-queue devices that set up irqs on
multiple CPUs.
> An alternate API would be one that just returned the full no_hz
> cpumask to kernel callers; I'd be happy with that as well, but my
> instinct was to make the API as narrow as possible to start with.
>
> Comments?
What drivers and subsystems are you targeting?
I am just looking at blk-mq now, and it seems like the
API most appropriate for that would be an inline function
that tests whether or not a CPU is nohz_full.
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
...
if (cpu_nohz_full(i))
continue;
}
A lot of the other code in drivers and subsystems that
set up per-cpu queues and irqs seem to iterate over all
CPUs at init time, and could benefit from a function
allowing them to skip nohz_full CPUs.
Your tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() function seems reasonable
too, for code that uses a cpumask to set up per cpu stuff.
> On 03/24/2015 03:21 PM, cmetcalf@ezchip.com wrote:
>> From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
>>
>> This is useful, for example, to modify a cpumask to avoid the
>> nohz cores so that interrupts aren't sent to them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
>> ---
>> Motivated by patch 4/4 in this series.
>>
>> include/linux/tick.h | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
>> index 9c085dc12ae9..d53ad4892a39 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/tick.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/tick.h
>> @@ -186,6 +186,12 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
>> return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
>> }
>> +static inline void tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus(struct cpumask *mask)
>> +{
>> + if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
>> + cpumask_andnot(mask, mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
>> +}
>> +
>> extern void __tick_nohz_full_check(void);
>> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick(void);
>> extern void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu);
>> @@ -194,6 +200,7 @@ extern void __tick_nohz_task_switch(struct
>> task_struct *tsk);
>> #else
>> static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
>> static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
>> +static inline void tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus(struct cpumask *mask) { }
>> static inline void __tick_nohz_full_check(void) { }
>> static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu) { }
>> static inline void tick_nohz_full_kick(void) { }
>
--
All rights reversed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-30 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 19:21 [PATCH 0/4] initial NOHZ_FULL support for tile cmetcalf
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] tile: support arch_irq_work_raise cmetcalf
2015-03-24 21:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-03-24 21:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-24 22:06 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-25 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] tile: support CONTEXT_TRACKING and thus NOHZ_FULL cmetcalf
2015-03-24 21:15 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-03-24 21:49 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] nohz: add tick_nohz_full_clear_cpus() API cmetcalf
2015-03-30 16:20 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-30 16:41 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2015-03-30 16:45 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-03-24 19:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: tile: don't send interrupts to nohz cores by default cmetcalf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55197CA2.9040706@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.