From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/33] xen/arm: Let the toolstack configure the number of SPIs Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:07:51 +0100 Message-ID: <551A8E17.1070505@linaro.org> References: <1426793399-6283-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1426793399-6283-17-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1427799247.2115.61.camel@citrix.com> <551A8888.8050902@linaro.org> <1427803190.2115.112.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycuxv-0008EF-Ny for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 12:08:19 +0000 Received: by wgoe14 with SMTP id e14so16444989wgo.0 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 05:08:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1427803190.2115.112.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Wei Liu , Ian Jackson , tim@xen.org, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 31/03/15 12:59, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> If not then I think we should just check against the architectural 1020 >>> limit and leave it at that. >> >> I would have to check on 988 (1020 - 32) which I find less readable. > > I'd test nr_spis+32 < 1020, which I think is clear enough. I will do that. Regards, -- Julien Grall