From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/33] xen/arm: Add support for non-PCI passthrough Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:07:55 +0100 Message-ID: <551A9C2B.9050800@linaro.org> References: <1426793399-6283-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@linaro.org> <1427803026.2115.111.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ycvu5-0002Kp-AX for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 13:08:25 +0000 Received: by wgra20 with SMTP id a20so18495321wgr.3 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2015 06:08:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1427803026.2115.111.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: manish.jaggi@caviumnetworks.com, tim@xen.org, robert.vanvossen@dornerworks.com, stefano.stabellini@citrix.com, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, Josh.Whitehead@dornerworks.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, andrii.tseglytskyi@globallogic.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi Ian, On 31/03/15 12:57, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > > I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and > could be applied, could you let me know how far through the acked bit of > the series you think it would be sensible to apply now? > > If there are any acked bits which follow unacked bits but which are > independent then let me know and I'll see if they can be applied. Patch up to #15 (except #7 which miss an ack from Jan) can be pushed. Although some of them contains nits. If it convenient for you, I can resend the series with the nits fixed and patch sorted in order to apply the first part. Regards, -- Julien Grall