From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf script segfault
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:36:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551AA2F8.9080205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150331125920.GE9438@kernel.org>
On 3/31/15 6:59 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:45:33PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:51:34PM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>>> tool was moved to ordered_events and is not initialized for pipe mode. I
>>> don't have time to look into it more than that before PTO on Wednesday.
>
>> I guess this one is enough, no? Checking with your example...
>
> So the following is better, can you give it a try, please?
>
> - Arnaldo
>
>
> From fbd7d154f01c47db71a3d8b0546911872aa1de54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 09:53:50 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] perf session: Always initialize ordered_events
>
> Even when it is not used to actually reorder events, some of its fields
> are used, like session->ordered_events->tool, to shorten function
> signatures where tool, for instance, was being passed, as the tool is
> needed for the ordered_events code, we need it there and might as well
> use it for other perf_session needs.
>
> This fixes a problem where 'perf script' had some condition that made
> session->ordered_events not to be initialized even with its
> script->tool ordered_events related flags asking for it to be, which
> looks like another bug and needs to be investigated further.
>
> Always initializing session->ordered_events at least leaves the current
> assumptions in place, so do it now.
>
> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-b1xxk0rwkz2a0gip1uufmjqg@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/session.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index adf0740c563b..89c66797abe4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(struct perf_data_file *file,
>
> session->repipe = repipe;
> machines__init(&session->machines);
> + ordered_events__init(&session->ordered_events, &session->machines,
> + session->evlist, tool, ordered_events__deliver_event);
>
> if (file) {
> if (perf_data_file__open(file))
> @@ -139,9 +141,6 @@ struct perf_session *perf_session__new(struct perf_data_file *file,
> tool->ordered_events && !perf_evlist__sample_id_all(session->evlist)) {
> dump_printf("WARNING: No sample_id_all support, falling back to unordered processing\n");
> tool->ordered_events = false;
> - } else {
> - ordered_events__init(&session->ordered_events, &session->machines,
> - session->evlist, tool, ordered_events__deliver_event);
> }
>
> return session;
>
Works for me. Reviewed-and-Tested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-31 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-30 22:51 [BUG] perf script segfault David Ahern
2015-03-30 23:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 12:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 13:36 ` David Ahern [this message]
2015-04-07 23:41 ` David Ahern
2015-04-07 23:49 ` David Ahern
2015-03-31 13:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 14:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 14:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 14:25 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 14:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 14:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 15:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 15:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-31 16:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 16:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-31 16:26 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551AA2F8.9080205@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.