From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 31 (build failures and culprits) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:45:48 -0700 Message-ID: <551B5BDC.5060706@roeck-us.net> References: <20150401000221.21961ecd@canb.auug.org.au> <20150331161640.GA16540@roeck-us.net> <20150331230749.GA6564@kroah.com> <20150401104233.563d0022@canb.auug.org.au> <551B56E0.7090209@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <551B56E0.7090209@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , Felipe Balbi , Ard Biesheuvel , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Lad@roeck-us.net, Prabhakar , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Mack , Mikko Perttunen , Thierry Reding List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On 03/31/2015 07:24 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 03/31/2015 04:42 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 01:07:49 +0200 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> >>>> alpha:allmodconfig >>>> mips:allmodconfig >>>> >>>> samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function =E2=80=98prime_new=E2=80= =99: >>>> samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c:930:18: error: =E2=80=98__NR_memfd_c= reate=E2=80=99 undeclared >>>> (first use in this function) >>>> p->fd =3D syscall(__NR_memfd_create, "prime-area", MFD_CLOEXEC)= ; >>>> >>>> Looks like the kdbus example never worked for the affected archite= ctures. >>>> I don't build allmodconfig for all architectures, so other archite= ctures >>>> may be affected as well. >>> >>> You need 3.17 kernel headers to have memfd_create, not much the kdb= us >>> test code can do about that. You might want to update the kernel >>> headers for these build boxes. >>> >>> Or have we not hooked up memfd for alpha and mips? >> >> alpha has no definition for __NR_memfd_create and doesn't use >> asm-generic/unistd.h. >> >> mips has a definition for __NR_memfd_create if _MIPS_SIM =3D=3D >> _MIPS_SIM_ABI32, _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 or _MIPS_SIM_NABI32 (is there any >> other alternative?). >> > > Guess you are saying that those examples won't build even with a > newer toolchain. Good that I already decided not to re-build my > toolchains ;-). > > Now I am left with the question if the samples build should be > masked for alpha and mips, or if I should drop building samples > from my 'allmodconfig' builds. I think I'll do the latter; > there seems to be an expectation that samples are built with > a recent toolchain, and I can not keep rebuilding toolchains for > the rest of my life. > Weird - the kdbus sample doesn't have its own configuration option, unlike other samples. So it's all or nothing for alpha and mips. Guenter