From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38124) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdLKG-0005lp-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:17:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdLKE-0008HN-SJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:17:07 -0400 Message-ID: <551C19F9.3020409@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 12:16:57 -0400 From: John Snow MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu-img behavior for locating backing files List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel , qemu-block Kevin, what's the correct behavior for qemu-img and relative paths when creating a new qcow2 file? Example: (in e.g. /home/qemu/build/ or anywhere not /home: ) qemu-img create -f qcow2 base.qcow2 32G qemu-img create -f qcow2 -F qcow2 -b base.qcow2 /home/overlay.qcow2 In 1.7.0., this produces a warning that the base object cannot be found (because it does not exist at that location relative to overlay.qcow2), but qemu-img will create the qcow2 for you regardless. 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2 all will create the image successfully, with no warnings. 2.3-rc1/master as they exist now will emit an error message and create no image. Since this is a change in behavior for the pending release, is this the correct/desired behavior?