From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, roopa <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: sfeldma@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, ronen.arad@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 25/26] switchdev: convert swdev_fib_ipv4_add/del over to swdev_port_obj_add/del
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 11:00:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <551ED558.3020303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150401160522.GE2025@nanopsycho.orion>
On 01/04/15 09:05, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> This looks nice. However, my only concern is we have now ended up adding a
>> whole layer of abstraction to all objects. The api abstraction seemed fine.
>> But, carrying it to objects and duplicating every object in the swdev layer
>> seems too much duplication. Maybe its just me.
>> we will end up adding this for bond attributes...vxlan...fdb and nftables
>
> +1
+1.
>
>> etc.
>>
>> The advantage of switchdev in the kernel was to have access the existing
>> kernel api and objects directly from switchdev layer.
>> In which case, to me, it would be better to skip this extra layer of objects.
>> And keep the way you had it originally.
Same here, I am not exactly sure how much good the abstract object is
giving us here since we are already in the kernel, and we cannot/do not
necessarily want to eliminate a large number of swdev_ops, as these are
precisely the API we want to define.
NB: if we were to do that for swdev_ops, the next step would be doing
the same thing for netdev_ops to reduce their number, would not we?
Maybe for now solving the stacked device problem and
prepare/commit/rollback is good enough to keep you busy that adding the
object layer is a completely secondary problem to solve ;)?
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-03 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-01 10:07 [PATCH net-next v2 00/26] switchdev: spring cleanup sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/26] switchdev: introduce get/set attrs ops sfeldma
2015-04-01 12:19 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2015-04-01 18:08 ` David Miller
2015-04-02 7:43 ` Scott Feldman
2015-04-02 16:05 ` David Miller
2015-04-02 17:38 ` Scott Feldman
2015-04-02 17:54 ` David Miller
2015-04-02 18:43 ` Andrew Lunn
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/26] switchdev: convert parent_id_get to swdev attr get sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/26] switchdev: convert STP update to swdev attr set sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/26] switchdev: add bridge port flags attr sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/26] rocker: use swdev get/set attr for bridge port flags sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/26] switchdev: introduce swdev add/del obj ops sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/26] switchdev: add port vlan obj sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/26] rocker: use swdev add/del obj for bridge port vlans sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/26] switchdev: add new swdev bridge setlink sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/26] rocker: cut over to new swdev_port_bridge_setlink sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/26] bonding: " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/26] team: " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/26] switchdev: remove old netdev_switch_port_bridge_setlink sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/26] switchdev: add new swdev_port_bridge_dellink sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 15/26] rocker: cut over to " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 16/26] bonding: " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 17/26] team: " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 18/26] switchdev: remove unused netdev_switch_port_bridge_dellink sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 19/26] switchdev: add new swdev_port_bridge_getlink sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 20/26] rocker: cut over to " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 21/26] bonding: " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 22/26] team: " sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 23/26] switchdev: rename netdev_switch_fib_* to swdev_fib_* sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 24/26] switchdev: rename netdev_switch_notifier_* to swdev_notifier_* sfeldma
2015-04-01 10:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 25/26] switchdev: convert swdev_fib_ipv4_add/del over to swdev_port_obj_add/del sfeldma
2015-04-01 11:47 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-04-01 15:05 ` roopa
2015-04-01 16:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2015-04-03 18:00 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-04-06 21:56 ` Scott Feldman
2015-04-01 10:08 ` [PATCH net-next v2 26/26] switchdev: bring documentation up-to-date sfeldma
2015-04-01 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/26] switchdev: spring cleanup Jiri Pirko
2015-04-01 18:02 ` Scott Feldman
2015-04-02 6:06 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=551ED558.3020303@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ronen.arad@intel.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=sfeldma@gmail.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.