All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/64: pack interrupt dispatch table tighter
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 12:06:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <551EE4BE.9090507@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwQV5Qb1V++wJQXDfv92mGfuwCidO9Y2rRP1ezZG9v4jA@mail.gmail.com>

On 04/03/2015 11:37 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:35 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>>
>> For the record, I actually measured the impact of the jump-to-jump when
>> I wrote it.  It has a small, *but measurable*, positive impact.
> 
> What did you compare against, and how did you measure that? I don't
> see how it could *possibly* be faster than just a simple aligned "push
> + jmp".
> 

I wish I remembered the exact details; it took a fair bit of gathering
numbers as the spread was quite a bit wider than the delta, but in the
end there were two distribution peaks clearly offset.

I seem to remember it involving a loop running RDTSC continuously and
another RDTSC in the interrupt path.

	-hpa



  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-03 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-03 11:13 [PATCH] x86/asm/entry/64: pack interrupt dispatch table tighter Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-03 14:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-03 16:12   ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-03 16:54   ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-04-03 18:08     ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-03 18:35       ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-04-03 18:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-03 19:06           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2015-04-04  6:42             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-03 18:36       ` Denys Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=551EE4BE.9090507@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.