From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 00069E00998; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:42:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [216.168.135.167]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE3D9E00993 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 05:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4279 invoked by uid 1003); 6 Apr 2015 12:41:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.11.132?) (philip@opensdr.com@108.44.116.31) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 6 Apr 2015 12:41:51 -0000 Message-ID: <55227F0E.3080003@balister.org> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 05:41:50 -0700 From: Philip Balister User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ken Davis , "yocto@yoctoproject.org" References: <5521E589.3010007@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <5521E589.3010007@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: what's the difference between meta-openembedded/meta-oe and meta-oe/meta-oe X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 12:42:01 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 04/05/2015 06:46 PM, Ken Davis wrote: > I'm soo confused. > > what's the difference between meta-openembedded/meta-oe and > meta-oe/meta-oe? > Nothing. The meta-oe (and oe-core) repos are deprecated and will be removed "soon". Make sure you use meta-openembedded and openembedded-core checkouts and refer to them in manifests and scripts. Philip