From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1FD17E007A0; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:15:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EE9E006E6 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pdbnk13 with SMTP id nk13so54912296pdb.0 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:15:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QwbQggzdE9cefjRj4xWoEy6fH/prWYwVGWdnzRsrWWQ=; b=Qo9tGuXRFfFP5fmL7X7gH4nN+ZKW3j2w/rB40CPvamEzyu4UJO5rfasv+J/ekv1NP/ ErJaJ0UOSLH1/luFEvc9hDJNfkaaMCoi4IS4lw94479k3wSo6YsnVsuIee99ir+D6H4z cYwzNIEldyV+ZEOimFKyEbQ6dr40iwJLRDp+eqmgbUkLnUc129FWc7E2E6bOQcBvsf66 xInodzDFiDGJj6Xhf9z5qjbe5OUGjzkaV/UuKb9SMdlkqHbRYmCc9+buK6vqWOhHoKCG o92RAvSPNQcurnAyqoC2mkOXg2UDiYuREr2OyAs49oJMEQ2w1YuN6m3FmyiyQ0OiBQtm GtUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdY/6oYiVy3r4ywRhJKjAnwn90hIC3WoUYm9ln+fs9+ZIcO5rhUaG0K1JXQiCp1ykRetNe X-Received: by 10.70.89.199 with SMTP id bq7mr19390091pdb.168.1428351346988; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (wsip-70-184-93-199.ph.ph.cox.net. [70.184.93.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm5588910pdj.65.2015.04.06.13.15.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5522E96F.2060507@boundarydevices.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 13:15:43 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador , Lauren Post References: <1428007119-13395-1-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> <1428007119-13395-2-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 01/11] linux-imx: Upgrade to 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA version X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 20:15:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Otavio and Lauren, On 04/06/2015 09:26 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Lauren Post wrote: >> 3.10.53 only exists in master branch now so to remove it means it will not exist on any branch. > > It exists in Git so if someone ever wants or need it, can easily > revert the patch and use. > >> In past we only removed kernel versions that exist in other branches. > > It was just by coincidence because of the release cadence matched the branching. > >> I believe it is best to leave 3.10.53 and remove in master branch after fido branch is created. What's the plan for the default FSL kernel in fido? If it's 3.14, then it seems unlikely that folks will be using 3.10.53. > > I see no reason to keep it around and untested from now on. Community > resources for test are restrict so it will end untested plus the more > people relying on 3.14 the better as it is closer to mainline. > Can you clarify what you mean by 'it'? > Someone one has any technical reason to keep it around? > If you're referring to 3.10.53 recipe for Freescale kernel, the tag/branch in git.freescale.com should be sufficient. Looking at Otavio's patch set, it appears that the changes include both kernel updates as well as some remaining packages (firmware-imx, imx-test, and such) that are named to reflect the kernel version numbering. https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-freescale/2015-April/013274.html Having those old recipes around is probably more useful than the kernel, since I don't think they're all backed by proper git repositories. How about just tagging/branching meta-fsl-* with a 3.10.53 name to make it easy to grab the set from before the switch? Regards, Eric