From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 73D97E009D9; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:04:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [209.85.192.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208ABE006E6 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 14:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pddn5 with SMTP id n5so55937435pdd.2 for ; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:04:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Ss3dJ5sxMit/qXH6QIM8BUpz4DwENHSJpgvzLYnciE=; b=HUJBoMwMVrY0jFJ7LuutlEidWEzczfINW8m+8rzRr122r6t5FiqHaJPkPdSB16aJ7a 99CgZ0KbZmHz2FCQ/mnWFHGTcHfrkR5z4z0+o9BUflv2mnuS7egjHoD4F94U15qZ1pJx Nw/SwQhc0Y1GfArjkbPIOtAgY4nUldD0AMfunfIeQUcb15lr9U6dIE14nj1ROyyiYyj6 dVoE9F/g4xrenk9wyGCFDPol3tqeF6Z/nkaGBcSjttSN1yX2ro9uj69KxxK1JuYQDe+x +swoPFSEnPvU6/RY2Kwsv75RJFUzrjP/l9bbdsBQmN+zNf2Gcqk7Q1i0wiw/Yxm7Z27g ZnLw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7znIjjis47oh2Cz7IHg+qhsPY/C4zob6LGyRFpSTJoNoJBCS1soaFsME7ejxqbXBaxK42 X-Received: by 10.70.34.129 with SMTP id z1mr30076668pdi.113.1428354243322; Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (wsip-70-184-93-199.ph.ph.cox.net. [70.184.93.199]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ia3sm2310249pbc.31.2015.04.06.14.04.01 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5522F4BF.4030400@boundarydevices.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 14:03:59 -0700 From: Eric Nelson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otavio Salvador References: <1428007119-13395-1-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> <1428007119-13395-2-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com> <5522E96F.2060507@boundarydevices.com> <5522F1B0.4070508@boundarydevices.com> In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 01/11] linux-imx: Upgrade to 3.14.28-1.0.0 GA version X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 21:04:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Otavio, On 04/06/2015 01:54 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Eric Nelson > wrote: >> How about this as a compromise? >> - Add 3.14 as new components, then >> - remove 3.10.53 in an explicit patch set >> >> This might make it easier for those who want to stick with 3.10.53 >> for a while. >> >> Otherwise, you are forcing users to pin their down-stream repositories >> at versions that precede the introduction of 3.14 or go through a >> complete kernel re-test. >> >> Production users should probably not be on the master branch anyway, >> but I suspect that some folks are doing that. > > You mean to split the patch in two: > > - one add 3.14.28 > - one remove 3.10.53 > > so if someone wants, just revert the second patch locally and keep it > in their three? > > If I got this right, this works for me. > That's exactly what I meant.